Zaitseva Elena, Mittal Aditya, Griffin Diane E, Chernomordik Leonid V
Section on Membrane Biology, Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Biophysics, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
J Cell Biol. 2005 Apr 11;169(1):167-77. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200412059. Epub 2005 Apr 4.
Viral fusion proteins of classes I and II differ radically in their initial structures but refold toward similar conformations upon activation. Do fusion pathways mediated by alphavirus E1 and influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) that exemplify classes II and I differ to reflect the difference in their initial conformations, or concur to reflect the similarity in the final conformations? Here, we dissected the pathway of low pH-triggered E1-mediated cell-cell fusion by reducing the numbers of activated E1 proteins and by blocking different fusion stages with specific inhibitors. The discovered progression from transient hemifusion to small, and then expanding, fusion pores upon an increase in the number of activated fusion proteins parallels that established for HA-mediated fusion. We conclude that proteins as different as E1 and HA drive fusion through strikingly similar membrane intermediates, with the most energy-intensive stages following rather than preceding hemifusion. We propose that fusion reactions catalyzed by all proteins of both classes follow a similar pathway.
I类和II类病毒融合蛋白在其初始结构上有根本差异,但在激活后会重新折叠成相似的构象。作为II类和I类代表的甲病毒E1和流感病毒血凝素(HA)介导的融合途径是不同以反映其初始构象的差异,还是一致以反映最终构象的相似性?在这里,我们通过减少活化的E1蛋白数量并用特异性抑制剂阻断不同的融合阶段,剖析了低pH触发的E1介导的细胞-细胞融合途径。随着活化融合蛋白数量的增加,所发现的从瞬时半融合到小的然后扩大的融合孔的进展与HA介导的融合所确立的进展相似。我们得出结论,像E1和HA这样不同的蛋白通过惊人相似的膜中间体驱动融合,最耗能的阶段发生在半融合之后而非之前。我们提出,这两类所有蛋白催化的融合反应都遵循相似的途径。