Huskamp Haiden A, Deverka Patricia A, Epstein Arnold M, Epstein Robert S, McGuigan Kimberly A, Muriel Anna C, Frank Richard G
Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, 180 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Apr;62(4):435-41. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.4.435.
Expenditures for medications used to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children have increased rapidly. Many employers and health plans have adopted 3-tier formularies in an attempt to control costs for these and other drugs.
To assess the effect of copayment increases associated with 3-tier formulary adoption on use and spending patterns for ADHD medications for children.
Observational study using quasi-experimental design to compare effects on ADHD medication use and spending for children enrolled as dependents in an employer-sponsored plan that made major changes to its pharmacy benefit design and a comparison group of children covered by the same insurer. The plan simultaneously moved from a 1-tier (same copayment required for all drugs) to a 3-tier formulary and implemented an across-the-board copayment increase. The plan later moved 3 drugs from tier 3 to tier 2.
An intervention group of 20 326 and a comparison group of 15 776 children aged 18 years and younger.
Monthly probability of using an ADHD medication; plan, enrollee, and total ADHD medication spending; and medication continuation.
A 3-tier formulary implementation resulted in a 17% decrease in the monthly probability of using medication (P<.001), a 20% decrease in expected total medication expenditures, and a substantial shifting of costs from the plan to families (P<.001). Intervention group children using medications in the pre-period were more likely to change to a medication in a different tier after 3-tier adoption, relative to the comparison group (P = .08). The subsequent tier changes resulted in increased plan spending (P<.001) and decreased patient spending (P = .003) for users but no differences in continuation.
The copayment increases associated with 3-tier formulary implementation by 1 employer resulted in lower total ADHD medication spending, sizeable increases in out-of-pocket expenditures for families of children with ADHD, and a significant decrease in the probability of using these medications.
用于治疗儿童注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的药物支出迅速增加。许多雇主和健康保险计划采用了三层药品目录,试图控制这些药物及其他药物的成本。
评估采用三层药品目录导致的自付费用增加对儿童ADHD药物使用和支出模式的影响。
采用准实验设计的观察性研究,比较对在雇主赞助计划中作为受抚养人参保的儿童(该计划对其药房福利设计进行了重大更改)以及由同一保险公司承保的儿童对照组的ADHD药物使用和支出的影响。该计划同时从单层(所有药物自付费用相同)转变为三层药品目录,并全面提高了自付费用。该计划后来将3种药物从第三层移至第二层。
20326名18岁及以下儿童的干预组和15776名儿童的对照组。
每月使用ADHD药物的概率;计划、参保者及ADHD药物总支出;以及药物持续使用情况。
三层药品目录的实施导致每月用药概率降低17%(P< .001),预期药物总支出降低20%,并且成本从计划大量转移至家庭(P< .001)。相对于对照组,干预组在前期使用药物的儿童在采用三层药品目录后更有可能改用不同层级的药物(P = .08)。随后的层级变化导致计划支出增加(P< .001),使用者的患者支出减少(P = .003),但持续使用情况无差异。
一家雇主实施三层药品目录导致自付费用增加,从而使ADHD药物总支出降低,ADHD儿童家庭的自付费用大幅增加,并且使用这些药物的概率显著降低。