Suppr超能文献

三层药品目录对儿童注意力缺陷多动障碍药物治疗的影响。

Impact of 3-tier formularies on drug treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children.

作者信息

Huskamp Haiden A, Deverka Patricia A, Epstein Arnold M, Epstein Robert S, McGuigan Kimberly A, Muriel Anna C, Frank Richard G

机构信息

Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, 180 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Apr;62(4):435-41. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.4.435.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Expenditures for medications used to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children have increased rapidly. Many employers and health plans have adopted 3-tier formularies in an attempt to control costs for these and other drugs.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of copayment increases associated with 3-tier formulary adoption on use and spending patterns for ADHD medications for children.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Observational study using quasi-experimental design to compare effects on ADHD medication use and spending for children enrolled as dependents in an employer-sponsored plan that made major changes to its pharmacy benefit design and a comparison group of children covered by the same insurer. The plan simultaneously moved from a 1-tier (same copayment required for all drugs) to a 3-tier formulary and implemented an across-the-board copayment increase. The plan later moved 3 drugs from tier 3 to tier 2.

PARTICIPANTS

An intervention group of 20 326 and a comparison group of 15 776 children aged 18 years and younger.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Monthly probability of using an ADHD medication; plan, enrollee, and total ADHD medication spending; and medication continuation.

RESULTS

A 3-tier formulary implementation resulted in a 17% decrease in the monthly probability of using medication (P<.001), a 20% decrease in expected total medication expenditures, and a substantial shifting of costs from the plan to families (P<.001). Intervention group children using medications in the pre-period were more likely to change to a medication in a different tier after 3-tier adoption, relative to the comparison group (P = .08). The subsequent tier changes resulted in increased plan spending (P<.001) and decreased patient spending (P = .003) for users but no differences in continuation.

CONCLUSIONS

The copayment increases associated with 3-tier formulary implementation by 1 employer resulted in lower total ADHD medication spending, sizeable increases in out-of-pocket expenditures for families of children with ADHD, and a significant decrease in the probability of using these medications.

摘要

背景

用于治疗儿童注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的药物支出迅速增加。许多雇主和健康保险计划采用了三层药品目录,试图控制这些药物及其他药物的成本。

目的

评估采用三层药品目录导致的自付费用增加对儿童ADHD药物使用和支出模式的影响。

设计与背景

采用准实验设计的观察性研究,比较对在雇主赞助计划中作为受抚养人参保的儿童(该计划对其药房福利设计进行了重大更改)以及由同一保险公司承保的儿童对照组的ADHD药物使用和支出的影响。该计划同时从单层(所有药物自付费用相同)转变为三层药品目录,并全面提高了自付费用。该计划后来将3种药物从第三层移至第二层。

参与者

20326名18岁及以下儿童的干预组和15776名儿童的对照组。

主要观察指标

每月使用ADHD药物的概率;计划、参保者及ADHD药物总支出;以及药物持续使用情况。

结果

三层药品目录的实施导致每月用药概率降低17%(P< .001),预期药物总支出降低20%,并且成本从计划大量转移至家庭(P< .001)。相对于对照组,干预组在前期使用药物的儿童在采用三层药品目录后更有可能改用不同层级的药物(P = .08)。随后的层级变化导致计划支出增加(P< .001),使用者的患者支出减少(P = .003),但持续使用情况无差异。

结论

一家雇主实施三层药品目录导致自付费用增加,从而使ADHD药物总支出降低,ADHD儿童家庭的自付费用大幅增加,并且使用这些药物的概率显著降低。

相似文献

1
Impact of 3-tier formularies on drug treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Apr;62(4):435-41. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.4.435.
2
The effect of incentive-based formularies on prescription-drug utilization and spending.
N Engl J Med. 2003 Dec 4;349(23):2224-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa030954.
4
Employer drug benefit plans and spending on prescription drugs.
JAMA. 2002 Oct 9;288(14):1733-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.14.1733.
6
Management of newer medications for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in commercial health plans.
Clin Ther. 2014 Dec 1;36(12):2034-2046. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.09.019. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
7
Effect on drug utilization and expenditures of a cost-share change from copayment to coinsurance.
J Manag Care Pharm. 2007 Nov-Dec;13(9):765-77. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2007.13.9.765.
8
The effect of three-tier formulary adoption on medication continuation and spending among elderly retirees.
Health Serv Res. 2007 Oct;42(5):1926-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00722.x.
9
Effect of a three-tier prescription copay on pharmaceutical and other medical utilization.
Med Care. 2001 Dec;39(12):1293-304. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200112000-00005.
10
Impact of a transition to more restrictive drug formulary on therapy discontinuation and medication adherence.
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2016 Feb;41(1):64-9. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12349. Epub 2016 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparison between the effects of drug costs and share of family income on drug costs in determining drug price.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Aug 6;100(31):e26877. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026877.
2
The impact of prescription drug co-payments for publicly insured families.
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Mar;21(2):261-274. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01125-3. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
3
Adherence to tyrosine kinase inhibitors among Medicare Part D beneficiaries with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Cancer. 2018 Jan 15;124(2):364-373. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31050. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
4
Financial Burden for Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Enrolled in Medicare Part D Taking Targeted Oral Anticancer Medications.
J Oncol Pract. 2017 Feb;13(2):e152-e162. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.014639. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
5
Patterns of Antipsychotic Prescribing by Physicians to Young Children.
Psychiatr Serv. 2016 Dec 1;67(12):1307-1314. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201500224. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
6
The Influence of Socioeconomic Status on Selection of Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation.
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 25;11(2):e0149142. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149142. eCollection 2016.
8
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of cap and co-payment on rational use of medicines.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 8;2015(5):CD007017. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007017.pub2.
9
ENTRY IN THE ADHD DRUGS MARKET: WELFARE IMPACT OF GENERICS AND ME-TOO'S.
J Ind Econ. 2013 Jun;61(2):339-392. doi: 10.1111/joie.12017.
10
Management of newer medications for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in commercial health plans.
Clin Ther. 2014 Dec 1;36(12):2034-2046. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.09.019. Epub 2014 Nov 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Pharmacy benefits and the use of drugs by the chronically ill.
JAMA. 2004 May 19;291(19):2344-50. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.19.2344.
2
How do incentive-based formularies influence drug selection and spending for hypertension?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Jan-Feb;23(1):227-36. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.1.227.
3
The effect of incentive-based formularies on prescription-drug utilization and spending.
N Engl J Med. 2003 Dec 4;349(23):2224-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa030954.
5
Effect of tiered prescription copayments on the use of preferred brand medications.
Med Care. 2003 Mar;41(3):398-406. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000053022.47132.82.
6
Employer drug benefit plans and spending on prescription drugs.
JAMA. 2002 Oct 9;288(14):1733-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.14.1733.
7
Effect of a three-tier prescription copay on pharmaceutical and other medical utilization.
Med Care. 2001 Dec;39(12):1293-304. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200112000-00005.
9
Prescription drug prices: why do some pay more than others do?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 Mar-Apr;20(2):115-28. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.20.2.115.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验