van't Veer M B, Kluin-Nelemans J C, van der Schoot C E, van Putten W L, Adriaansen H J, van Wering E R
Dr Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Br J Haematol. 1992 Apr;80(4):458-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1992.tb04558.x.
In order to standardize and assess the quality of immunophenotyping of leukaemias and lymphomas for diagnostic purposes, a cooperative study group in the Netherlands, SIHON, has formulated guidelines for the composition of antibody panels to be applied and guidelines for the interpretation of the marker analysis. To assess the value of these guidelines frozen cell samples of three patients with different haematological malignancies were sent to the 26 participating laboratories twice a year. Here we present the results with respect to the marker analysis and to the immunological diagnosis on 387 samples from 18 patients. A large inter-laboratory variation was seen in the percentage of positive cells for each marker, which influenced the valuation of a marker to be discordant positive in up to 23% and discordant negative in up to 40%. No single major factor could be traced to explain the large variation in the results. However, probably due to the balanced composition of the antibody panel and to the application of the guidelines for interpretation, this variation did not much influence the agreement in immunological diagnosis. In only 13/387 samples (3.3%) differences in the percentage of positive cells caused disagreement in the final diagnosis. In 23 samples (5.9%) the disagreement was due to an incorrect application of the guidelines. Quantitative data of single observations obtained from different laboratories, in which the materials and methods are not standardized, cannot be compared; but standardization of guidelines for marker sets and for interpretation contributes to a high grade of agreement in immunological diagnosis.
为规范和评估用于诊断目的的白血病和淋巴瘤免疫分型的质量,荷兰的一个合作研究小组SIHON制定了关于所用抗体组合组成的指南以及标志物分析解释指南。为评估这些指南的价值,每年两次将三名患有不同血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的冷冻细胞样本送至26个参与实验室。在此我们展示了对来自18名患者的387份样本的标志物分析和免疫诊断结果。每个标志物阳性细胞百分比在各实验室间存在很大差异,这导致对某个标志物判断为不一致阳性的比例高达23%,不一致阴性的比例高达40%。未发现单一主要因素可解释结果中的巨大差异。然而,可能由于抗体组合的平衡组成以及解释指南的应用,这种差异对免疫诊断的一致性影响不大。在387份样本中仅有13份(3.3%)阳性细胞百分比的差异导致最终诊断存在分歧。在23份样本(5.9%)中,分歧是由于指南应用错误。从不同实验室获得的单一观察结果的定量数据,因其材料和方法未标准化,无法进行比较;但标志物组合和解释指南的标准化有助于在免疫诊断中达成高度一致。