Beyer David C, McKeough Timothy, Thomas Theresa
Arizona Oncology Services, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Apr 1;61(5):1299-305. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.08.024.
To review the impact of prior hormonal therapy on 10-year overall and prostate cancer specific survival after primary brachytherapy.
A retrospective review was performed on the Arizona Oncology Services tumor registry for 2,378 consecutive permanent prostate brachytherapy cases from 1988 through 2001. Hormonal therapy was administered before the implant in 464 patients for downsizing of the prostate or at the discretion of the referring physician. All deceased patients with known clinical recurrence were considered to have died of prostate cancer, irrespective of the immediate cause of death. Risk groups were defined, with 1,135 favorable (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] < 10, Gleason < 7, Stage T1-T2a), 787 intermediate (single adverse feature), and 456 unfavorable (two or more adverse features) patients. Kaplan-Meier actuarial survival curves were generated for both overall and cause-specific survival from the time of treatment. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess the impact of hormonal intervention in comparison with known risk factors of grade, PSA, and age.
With follow-up ranging up to 12.6 years and a median of 4.1 year, a total of 474 patients died, with 67 recorded as due to prostate cancer. Overall and cause-specific 10-year survival rates are 43% and 88%, respectively. Overall survival is 44% for the hormone naive patients, compared with 20% for the hormone-treated cohort (p = 0.02). The cancer-specific survival is 89% vs. 81% for the same groups (p = 0.133). Multivariate analysis confirms the significance of age > 70 years (p = 0.0013), Gleason score >/= 7 (p = 0.0005), and prior hormone use (p = 0.0065) on overall survival.
At 10 years, in prostate cancer patients receiving brachytherapy, overall survival is worse in men receiving neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, compared with hormone naive patients. This does not appear to be due to other known risk factors for survival (i.e., stage, grade, PSA, age) on multivariate analysis. The leading causes of death were cardiovascular, prostate cancer, and other cancers with no obvious discrepancy between the two groups. This finding is unexpected and requires confirmation from other centers.
回顾先前激素治疗对原发性近距离放射治疗后10年总生存率和前列腺癌特异性生存率的影响。
对亚利桑那肿瘤服务中心肿瘤登记处1988年至2001年连续的2378例永久性前列腺近距离放射治疗病例进行回顾性研究。464例患者在植入前接受激素治疗以缩小前列腺体积,或由转诊医生酌情决定。所有已知临床复发的死亡患者均被视为死于前列腺癌,无论其直接死因如何。定义了风险组,其中1135例为有利组(前列腺特异性抗原[PSA]<10,Gleason评分<7,T1-T2a期),787例为中间组(单一不良特征),456例为不利组(两个或更多不良特征)。从治疗时起生成总生存率和病因特异性生存率的Kaplan-Meier精算生存曲线。进行多变量分析以评估激素干预与已知的分级、PSA和年龄风险因素相比的影响。
随访时间长达12.6年,中位随访时间为4.1年,共有474例患者死亡,其中67例记录为死于前列腺癌。10年总生存率和病因特异性生存率分别为43%和88%。未接受激素治疗的患者总生存率为44%,而接受激素治疗的队列总生存率为20%(p=0.02)。相同组别的癌症特异性生存率分别为89%和81%(p=0.133)。多变量分析证实年龄>70岁(p=0.0013)、Gleason评分≥7(p=0.0005)和先前使用激素(p=0.0065)对总生存率有显著影响。
在接受近距离放射治疗的前列腺癌患者中,10年后,与未接受激素治疗的患者相比,接受新辅助激素治疗的男性总生存率更差。多变量分析显示,这似乎并非由于其他已知的生存风险因素(即分期、分级、PSA水平、年龄)所致。主要死因是心血管疾病、前列腺癌和其他癌症,两组之间无明显差异。这一发现出乎意料,需要其他中心予以证实。