Reite Ola B
Department of Basic Sciences and Aquatic Medicine, Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, Oslo.
Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2005 Sep;19(3):253-67. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2005.01.002.
The distribution and potential function of the rodlet cells of teleosts were studied by microscopic observations on tissue samples from the digestive tract and adjacent tissues, including the bulbus arteriosus. Fish representing 3-5 genera from each of the families Salmonidae, Cyprinidae, Gadidae and Labridae were included in the study. Great individual variations in the distribution of rodlet cells were found in all species of salmonids, gadids and labrids. The cells seemed to be absent in some individuals of a species and were associated with different epithelial tissues in others, but were not found in vascular endothelia. Their occurrence was common in all salmonids caught in their natural environment, whereas those in aquaculture, kept under controlled conditions with respect to water quality, showed extremely few rodlet cells. In species of the cyprinid family, the picture was different. Rodlet cells were consistently present under the endothelium of the bulbus arteriosus, and were very numerous at this location in individuals infected with blood flukes. In other epithelial tissues of cyprinids, rodlet cells were encountered in fairly high numbers, but in some tissues of individuals from all species they were occasionally absent. In all of the studied families rodlet cells seemed to be recruited when helminths affected epithelial tissues. Mast cells/eosinophilic granule cells were consistently very numerous in tissues of the intestine of cyprinids and labrids. In gadids, mast cells/eosinophilic granule cells seemed to be absent. Present evidence points to a role for the rodlet cells in defence functions, e.g. in combating helminths, and the suggestion earlier made for mast cells/eosinophilic granule cells, that evolution has created a "standing force" in particular tissues of teleosts consistently exposed to pathogens, whereas an efficient "mobilization force" has been an advantage in those living in more pathogen-free environments, may also be applied to rodlet cells, explaining the differences between teleostean families with respect to their distribution pattern.
通过对包括动脉球在内的消化道及相邻组织的组织样本进行显微镜观察,研究了硬骨鱼小棒状细胞的分布和潜在功能。研究中纳入了鲑科、鲤科、鳕科和隆头鱼科各3 - 5个属的鱼类。在所有鲑科鱼类、鳕科鱼类和隆头鱼科鱼类中,均发现小棒状细胞的分布存在很大的个体差异。在一个物种的某些个体中,这些细胞似乎不存在,而在其他个体中则与不同的上皮组织相关,但在血管内皮中未发现。它们在自然环境中捕获的所有鲑科鱼类中普遍存在,而在水质受控条件下养殖的鲑科鱼类中,小棒状细胞极少。在鲤科鱼类中,情况则不同。小棒状细胞始终存在于动脉球的内皮下方,在感染血吸虫的个体中,此处数量非常多。在鲤科鱼类的其他上皮组织中,也能发现数量相当多的小棒状细胞,但在所有物种个体的某些组织中偶尔也不存在。在所有研究的科中,当蠕虫感染上皮组织时,小棒状细胞似乎会被募集。肥大细胞/嗜酸性粒细胞在鲤科和隆头鱼科鱼类肠道组织中始终非常多。在鳕科鱼类中,肥大细胞/嗜酸性粒细胞似乎不存在。现有证据表明小棒状细胞在防御功能中发挥作用,例如对抗蠕虫,之前对肥大细胞/嗜酸性粒细胞的推测,即进化在硬骨鱼持续暴露于病原体的特定组织中创造了一种“常备力量”,而高效的“动员力量”对生活在病原体较少环境中的硬骨鱼具有优势,这一推测也可能适用于小棒状细胞,解释了硬骨鱼科之间在分布模式上的差异。