Januzzi James L, Camargo Carlos A, Anwaruddin Saif, Baggish Aaron L, Chen Annabel A, Krauser Daniel G, Tung Roderick, Cameron Renee, Nagurney J Tobias, Chae Claudia U, Lloyd-Jones Donald M, Brown David F, Foran-Melanson Stacy, Sluss Patrick M, Lee-Lewandrowski Elizabeth, Lewandrowski Kent B
Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 2005 Apr 15;95(8):948-54. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.12.032.
The utility of aminoterminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) testing in the emergency department to rule out acute congestive heart failure (CHF) and the optimal cutpoints for this use are not established. We conducted a prospective study of 600 patients who presented in the emergency department with dyspnea. The clinical diagnosis of acute CHF was determined by study physicians who were blinded to NT-proBNP results. The primary end point was a comparison of NT-proBNP results with the clinical assessment of the managing physician for identifying acute CHF. The median NT-proBNP level among 209 patients (35%) who had acute CHF was 4,054 versus 131 pg/ml among 390 patients (65%) who did not (p <0.001). NT-proBNP at cutpoints of >450 pg/ml for patients <50 years of age and >900 pg/ml for patients >or=50 years of age were highly sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of acute CHF (p <0.001). An NT-proBNP level <300 pg/ml was optimal for ruling out acute CHF, with a negative predictive value of 99%. Increased NT-proBNP was the strongest independent predictor of a final diagnosis of acute CHF (odds ratio 44, 95% confidence interval 21.0 to 91.0, p <0.0001). NT-proBNP testing alone was superior to clinical judgment alone for diagnosing acute CHF (p = 0.006); NT-proBNP plus clinical judgment was superior to NT-proBNP or clinical judgment alone. NT-proBNP measurement is a valuable addition to standard clinical assessment for the identification and exclusion of acute CHF in the emergency department setting.
氨基末端脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)检测在急诊科用于排除急性充血性心力衰竭(CHF)的效用以及该用途的最佳切点尚未确定。我们对600例因呼吸困难到急诊科就诊的患者进行了一项前瞻性研究。急性CHF的临床诊断由对NT-proBNP结果不知情的研究医生确定。主要终点是将NT-proBNP结果与主治医生对急性CHF的临床评估进行比较。209例(35%)患有急性CHF的患者中NT-proBNP水平中位数为4054 pg/ml,而390例(65%)未患急性CHF的患者中为131 pg/ml(p<0.001)。对于<50岁的患者,NT-proBNP切点>450 pg/ml,对于≥50岁的患者,切点>900 pg/ml,对急性CHF的诊断具有高度敏感性和特异性(p<0.001)。NT-proBNP水平<300 pg/ml最适合排除急性CHF,阴性预测值为99%。NT-proBNP升高是急性CHF最终诊断的最强独立预测因素(比值比44,95%置信区间21.0至91.0,p<0.0001)。单独进行NT-proBNP检测在诊断急性CHF方面优于单独的临床判断(p = 0.006);NT-proBNP加临床判断优于单独的NT-proBNP或临床判断。在急诊科环境中,NT-proBNP检测是标准临床评估中用于识别和排除急性CHF的一项有价值的补充。