Daniel Emma, Kent Gerry, Binney Val, Pagdin Jonathan
University of Sheffield, UK.
Br J Health Psychol. 2005 Feb;10(Pt 1):101-14. doi: 10.1348/135910704X14609.
To explore how families make decisions about elective leg-lengthening surgical treatment.
Interviews were conducted and analysed using Interpretative Phenomeno logical Analysis (Smith, 1995).
Data were gathered using semi-structured interviews with nine mothers of children who had recently decided to undergo treatment.
Overall, the decision process was guided by the mothers' central concern to act responsibly as a parent. Thematic analysis indicated that the decision was taken in a social context where short stature could lead to discrimination and disability. The decision-making process evolved gradually over several years as mothers and children gathered information about treatment. While mothers emphasized that ultimately it was their child's decision, they monitored the decision process and filtered the information available in an attempt to ensure that the child made a well-informed and wise choice.
The decision was presented as an ongoing process by the mothers, their concerns representing their desire to do their best as parents for their children. Theoretically, the mothers' description of the process can be understood in terms of their attempts to resolve an ethical dilemma. Clinical implications include recognition of the role of the psychologist in supporting mothers in their decision making and thus indirectly helping children.
探讨家庭如何做出关于选择性肢体延长手术治疗的决策。
采用解释现象学分析方法(史密斯,1995年)进行访谈并分析。
通过对九位最近决定接受治疗的儿童的母亲进行半结构化访谈来收集数据。
总体而言,决策过程以母亲作为家长要负责任行事这一核心关注点为导向。主题分析表明,该决策是在一个身材矮小可能导致歧视和残疾的社会背景下做出的。随着母亲和孩子收集有关治疗的信息,决策过程在几年间逐渐演变。虽然母亲们强调最终是孩子的决定,但她们会监控决策过程并筛选可用信息,试图确保孩子做出明智且消息灵通的选择。
母亲们将该决策描述为一个持续的过程,她们的担忧代表了她们作为家长为孩子尽力而为的愿望。从理论上讲,母亲们对这一过程的描述可以从她们试图解决伦理困境的角度来理解。临床意义包括认识到心理学家在支持母亲做决策从而间接帮助孩子方面的作用。