• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科慢性病治疗决策的演变:对家长决策过程的定性纵向观察

Evolution of Pediatric Chronic Disease Treatment Decisions: A Qualitative, Longitudinal View of Parents' Decision-Making Process.

作者信息

Lipstein Ellen A, Britto Maria T

机构信息

Center for Innovation in Chronic Disease Care, Division of Adolescent Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH (EAL, MTB)

James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH (EAL, MTB)

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 2015 Aug;35(6):703-13. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15581805. Epub 2015 Apr 21.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X15581805
PMID:25899248
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4618270/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the context of pediatric chronic conditions, patients and families are called upon repeatedly to make treatment decisions. However, little is known about how their decision making evolves over time. The objective was to understand parents' processes for treatment decision making in pediatric chronic conditions.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative, prospective longitudinal study using recorded clinic visits and individual interviews. After consent was obtained from health care providers, parents, and patients, clinic visits during which treatment decisions were expected to be discussed were video-recorded. Parents then participated in sequential telephone interviews about their decision-making experience. Data were coded by 2 people and analyzed using framework analysis with sequential, time-ordered matrices.

RESULTS

21 families, including 29 parents, participated in video-recording and interviews. We found 3 dominant patterns of decision evolution. Each consisted of a series of decision events, including conversations, disease flares, and researching of treatment options. Within all 3 patterns there were both constant and evolving elements of decision making, such as role perceptions and treatment expectations, respectively. After parents made a treatment decision, they immediately turned to the next decision related to the chronic condition, creating an iterative cycle.

CONCLUSION

In this study, decision making was an iterative process occurring in 3 distinct patterns. Understanding these patterns and the varying elements of parents' decision processes is an essential step toward developing interventions that are appropriate to the setting and that capitalize on the skills families may develop as they gain experience with a chronic condition. Future research should also consider the role of children and adolescents in this decision process.

摘要

背景

在儿科慢性病的背景下,患者及其家庭需要反复做出治疗决策。然而,对于他们的决策过程如何随时间演变,我们知之甚少。目的是了解父母在儿科慢性病治疗决策中的过程。

方法

我们采用记录门诊就诊情况和个人访谈的方式进行了一项定性、前瞻性纵向研究。在获得医疗服务提供者、父母和患者的同意后,对预计会讨论治疗决策的门诊就诊进行录像。然后,父母参与一系列关于他们决策经历的电话访谈。由两人对数据进行编码,并使用带有顺序、时间顺序矩阵的框架分析进行分析。

结果

21个家庭,包括29位父母,参与了录像和访谈。我们发现了3种主要的决策演变模式。每种模式都由一系列决策事件组成,包括对话、病情发作和治疗方案研究。在所有3种模式中,决策都有恒定和演变的元素,分别如角色认知和治疗期望。父母做出治疗决策后,会立即转向与慢性病相关的下一个决策,形成一个迭代循环。

结论

在本研究中,决策是一个以3种不同模式出现的迭代过程。了解这些模式以及父母决策过程中的不同元素,是开发适合该环境并利用家庭在应对慢性病过程中可能发展出的技能的干预措施的关键一步。未来的研究还应考虑儿童和青少年在这一决策过程中的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12b3/4618270/f98bb3fd3fa9/nihms-675656-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12b3/4618270/a9883bb0e6c6/nihms-675656-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12b3/4618270/f98bb3fd3fa9/nihms-675656-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12b3/4618270/a9883bb0e6c6/nihms-675656-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12b3/4618270/f98bb3fd3fa9/nihms-675656-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Evolution of Pediatric Chronic Disease Treatment Decisions: A Qualitative, Longitudinal View of Parents' Decision-Making Process.儿科慢性病治疗决策的演变:对家长决策过程的定性纵向观察
Med Decis Making. 2015 Aug;35(6):703-13. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15581805. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
2
Parents' information needs and influential factors when making decisions about TNF-α inhibitors.父母在做出关于肿瘤坏死因子-α抑制剂的决策时的信息需求及影响因素。
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2016 Sep 15;14(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12969-016-0113-5.
3
Making decisions about chronic disease treatment: a comparison of parents and their adolescent children.慢性病治疗决策:父母与青少年子女的比较
Health Expect. 2016 Jun;19(3):716-26. doi: 10.1111/hex.12210. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
4
Views of treatment decision making from adolescents with chronic illnesses and their parents: a pilot study.慢性病青少年及其父母对治疗决策的看法:一项试点研究。
Health Expect. 2008 Dec;11(4):343-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00508.x.
5
Parents' information needs in tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor treatment decisions.家长在肿瘤坏死因子-α抑制剂治疗决策中的信息需求。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013 Mar;56(3):244-50. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31827496c3.
6
"I'm the one taking it": adolescent participation in chronic disease treatment decisions.“我来负责”:青少年参与慢性病治疗决策。
J Adolesc Health. 2013 Aug;53(2):253-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.02.004. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
7
Qualitative Analysis of Pediatric Patient and Caregiver Perspectives After Recent Diagnosis With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.近期诊断为炎症性肠病的儿科患者及其照顾者观点的定性分析
J Pediatr Nurs. 2018 Jan-Feb;38:106-113. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2017.11.011. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
8
High Levels of Decisional Conflict and Decision Regret When Making Decisions About Biologics.在做出关于生物制剂的决策时,存在高度的决策冲突和决策后悔情绪。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2016 Dec;63(6):e176-e181. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001425.
9
Exploration of Parent-Provider Communication During Clinic Visits for Children With Chronic Conditions.探讨慢性疾病患儿就诊时的家长-医护人员沟通情况。
J Pediatr Health Care. 2018 Jan-Feb;32(1):21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2017.06.005. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
10
What influences parents' decisions to limit or withdraw life support?是什么影响了父母做出限制或撤销生命维持治疗的决定?
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005 Sep;6(5):513-8. doi: 10.1097/01.pcc.0000170616.28175.d9.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the "shared" in shared decision-making in the care for children with chronic diseases or disabilities: what are the roles of parents and professionals?探索慢性病或残疾儿童护理中共同决策里的“共同”因素:父母和专业人员分别扮演什么角色?
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Dec 19;184(1):91. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05930-8.
2
Treatment preferences in spinal muscular atrophy: A swing weighting study for caregivers of patients with SMA types 1 and 2.脊髓性肌萎缩症的治疗偏好:SMA 1 型和 2 型患者照顾者的权衡研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 21;19(10):e0309666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309666. eCollection 2024.
3
Trajectory analysis of the work and life experience of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal qualitative study.

本文引用的文献

1
Making decisions about chronic disease treatment: a comparison of parents and their adolescent children.慢性病治疗决策:父母与青少年子女的比较
Health Expect. 2016 Jun;19(3):716-26. doi: 10.1111/hex.12210. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
2
Real life clinic visits do not match the ideals of shared decision making.现实生活中的临床就诊情况与共同决策的理想状态并不相符。
J Pediatr. 2014 Jul;165(1):178-183.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.03.042. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
3
Children's participation in shared decision-making: children, adolescents, parents and healthcare professionals' perspectives and experiences.
新冠疫情期间医护人员工作与生活经历的轨迹分析:一项纵向定性研究
BMC Nurs. 2023 Sep 27;22(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01520-5.
4
Parents' perspectives on talk with their adolescent and emerging adult children about sex: A longitudinal analysis.父母与处于青春期及成年初期的子女谈论性话题的观点:一项纵向分析
Sex Res Social Policy. 2023 Mar;20(1):216-229. doi: 10.1007/s13178-021-00656-w. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
5
A Discrete Choice Analysis Comparing COVID-19 Vaccination Decisions for Children and Adults.儿童和成人的 COVID-19 疫苗接种决策的离散选择分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2253582. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.53582.
6
Longitudinal online diaries with dental practitioners and dental care professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: A trajectory analysis.COVID-19大流行期间与牙科从业者和牙科护理专业人员的纵向在线日记:轨迹分析
Front Oral Health. 2022 Dec 22;3:1074655. doi: 10.3389/froh.2022.1074655. eCollection 2022.
7
Pilot trial of iBDecide: Evaluating an online tool to facilitate shared decision making for adolescents and young adults with ulcerative colitis.iBDecide 初步试验:评估一种在线工具,以促进患有溃疡性结肠炎的青少年和年轻成年人的共同决策。
Health Expect. 2022 Dec;25(6):3105-3113. doi: 10.1111/hex.13618. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
8
Preferences for and Experiences of Shared and Informed Decision Making Among Patients Choosing Kidney Replacement Therapies in Nephrology Care.肾病护理中选择肾脏替代疗法的患者对共同决策和知情决策的偏好与体验
Kidney Med. 2021 Jul 30;3(6):905-915.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2021.05.011. eCollection 2021 Nov-Dec.
9
Timing of food consumption in Hispanic adolescents with obesity. Hispanic 青少年肥胖者的进食时间。
Pediatr Obes. 2021 Jul;16(7):e12764. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12764. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
10
Shared decision making in IBD: A novel approach to trial consent and timing.炎症性肠病中的共同决策:试验同意和时机的新方法。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 Sep 8;16:100447. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100447. eCollection 2019 Dec.
儿童参与共同决策:儿童、青少年、家长及医疗保健专业人员的观点与经验
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2014 Jun;18(3):273-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2014.01.006. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
4
Understanding preferences for disease-modifying drugs in osteoarthritis.了解骨关节炎中改善病情药物的偏好。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Aug;66(8):1186-92. doi: 10.1002/acr.22280.
5
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临健康治疗或筛查决策的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 28(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4.
6
Facing persistent challenges in pediatric decision-making: new Hastings Center guidelines.面对儿科决策中持续存在的挑战:新的黑斯廷斯中心指南
Pediatrics. 2013 Nov;132(5):789-91. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1378. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
7
Understanding treatment decision making in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a qualitative assessment.理解青少年特发性关节炎的治疗决策:定性评估。
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2013 Sep 30;11(1):34. doi: 10.1186/1546-0096-11-34.
8
"I'm the one taking it": adolescent participation in chronic disease treatment decisions.“我来负责”:青少年参与慢性病治疗决策。
J Adolesc Health. 2013 Aug;53(2):253-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.02.004. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
9
Parental explicit heuristics in decision-making for children with life-threatening illnesses.父母在面临危及生命的儿童决策中的明确启发式方法。
Pediatrics. 2013 Feb;131(2):e566-72. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1957. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
10
Parents' information needs in tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor treatment decisions.家长在肿瘤坏死因子-α抑制剂治疗决策中的信息需求。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013 Mar;56(3):244-50. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31827496c3.