Nerlich Brigitte, Hellsten Iina
Institute for the Study of Genetics, Biorisks and Society, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.
New Genet Soc. 2004 Dec;23(3):255-68. doi: 10.1080/1463677042000305039.
This article examines the shifts and changes in the metaphors used to describe the human genome and the human genome project (HGP) between 2000 and 2003, with the year 2001 as a trigger for genomic and metaphorical reflection. We want to answer questions, such as: Did the findings announced in 2001 shake the metaphorical foundations on which the HGP had been built or not? Did novel metaphors capture the imagination of scientists and the public or did old metaphors survive throughout this period? What influence does the continuity or discontinuity in metaphorical framing of the HGP have on the public perception of the HGP as well as on its scientific understanding? To answer these questions we have systematically compared the metaphors used in one major scientific journal, Nature, and in one major UK newspaper, the online edition of the Guardian/The Observer during a period of two months around June 2000, February 2001 and April 2003.
本文探讨了2000年至2003年间用于描述人类基因组和人类基因组计划(HGP)的隐喻的转变与变化,将2001年作为基因组和隐喻反思的触发点。我们想要回答一些问题,比如:2001年公布的研究结果是否动摇了人类基因组计划所基于的隐喻基础?新的隐喻是否激发了科学家和公众的想象力,还是旧的隐喻在这一时期一直存在?人类基因组计划隐喻框架的连续性或不连续性对公众对该计划的认知以及对其科学理解有何影响?为了回答这些问题,我们系统地比较了在2000年6月、2001年2月和2003年4月前后两个月期间,在一本主要科学期刊《自然》以及英国一份主要报纸《卫报》/《观察家报》的网络版中所使用的隐喻。