• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机械反压式与气加压太空服手套:抓握力与灵敏度

Mechanical counter-pressure vs. gas-pressurized spacesuit gloves: grip and sensitivity.

作者信息

Danaher Patrick, Tanaka Kunihiko, Hargens Alan R

机构信息

University of California, San Diego, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, San Diego, CA 92103-8894, USA.

出版信息

Aviat Space Environ Med. 2005 Apr;76(4):381-4.

PMID:15828639
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

An elastic mechanical counter pressure (MCP) glove for spacesuits is under development. In this study we compared handgrip and pinch grip strength levels for the MCP glove and the current extravehicular mobility unit (EMU) gas-pressurized glove.

METHODS

We employed handgrip and pinch grip dynamometers to assess strength levels and von Frey monofilaments to evaluate hand sensitivity. Tests were conducted with the gloved hand inserted in an evacuation chamber at 200 mmHg below atmospheric pressure to simulate conditions in space.

RESULTS

Average bare hand strength was 463 N and decreased to 240 N for EMU and 250 N for MCP. Pinch grip and key grip testing showed no difference among conditions. However, there was a significant decrease in palmar grip strength from 111 N barehanded to 67 N in both gloves. Barehanded endurance time was 160 s and dropped to 63 and 69 s for EMU and MCP, respectively. Sensitivity was significantly better for MCP compared with the EMU.

DISCUSSION

The MCP glove improved hand sensitivity when compared with the EMU glove and performed as well as the EMU glove in terms of overall handgrip strength, endurance at 25% of maximum handgrip strength, pinch grip, palmar grip, and key grip tests. Improvements in fabric composition and glove design may further improve ergonomic and other functional parameters of the MCP glove.

摘要

引言

一种用于太空服的弹性机械反压(MCP)手套正在研发中。在本研究中,我们比较了MCP手套和当前舱外活动装置(EMU)气加压手套的握力和捏力强度水平。

方法

我们使用握力计和捏力计来评估强度水平,并用冯·弗雷单丝来评估手部敏感度。测试时将戴手套的手插入一个低于大气压200 mmHg的真空室中,以模拟太空环境。

结果

裸手平均力量为463 N,EMU手套条件下降至240 N,MCP手套条件下降至250 N。捏力和钥匙抓握测试在不同条件下未显示出差异。然而,两种手套的手掌握力均从裸手时的111 N显著降至67 N。裸手耐力时间为160 s,EMU手套和MCP手套分别降至63 s和69 s。与EMU手套相比,MCP手套的敏感度明显更高。

讨论

与EMU手套相比,MCP手套提高了手部敏感度,并且在整体握力强度、最大握力强度25%时的耐力、捏力、手掌握力和钥匙抓握测试方面表现与EMU手套相当。织物成分和手套设计的改进可能会进一步改善MCP手套的人体工程学和其他功能参数。

相似文献

1
Mechanical counter-pressure vs. gas-pressurized spacesuit gloves: grip and sensitivity.机械反压式与气加压太空服手套:抓握力与灵敏度
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2005 Apr;76(4):381-4.
2
Compression under a mechanical counter pressure space suit glove.
J Gravit Physiol. 2002 Dec;9(2):93-7.
3
Skin blood flow with elastic compressive extravehicular activity space suit.
Biol Sci Space. 2003 Oct;17(3):227.
4
[Study of mechanical effects of the EVA glove on finger base with finite element modeling].
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2013 Aug;30(4):767-71.
5
Mechanical counter pressure on the arm counteracts adverse effects of hypobaric exposures.对手臂施加机械反压可抵消低压暴露的不良影响。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2003 Aug;74(8):827-32.
6
The effects of glove thickness and work load on female hand performance and fatigue during a infrequent high-intensity gripping task.在一项不常见的高强度抓握任务中,手套厚度和工作量对女性手部表现及疲劳的影响。
Appl Ergon. 2007 May;38(3):317-24. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2006.04.024. Epub 2006 Jun 27.
7
Skin microvascular flow during hypobaric exposure with and without a mechanical counter-pressure space suit glove.在有和没有机械反压太空服手套的情况下,低压暴露期间的皮肤微血管血流。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2002 Nov;73(11):1074-8.
8
Mobility of the elastic counterpressure space suit glove.弹性反压航天服手套的灵活性
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2009 Oct;80(10):890-3. doi: 10.3357/asem.2562.2009.
9
Effects of EVA gloves on grip strength and fatigue under low temperature and low pressure.乙烯-醋酸乙烯共聚物(EVA)手套在低温低压条件下对握力和疲劳的影响。
Appl Ergon. 2016 Mar;53 Pt A:17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.08.010. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
10
Effect of pressure garment work gloves on hand function in patients with hand burns: a pilot study.
J Hand Ther. 2004 Jul-Sep;17(3):368-76. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2004.04.007.