• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of systematic monitoring of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity in daily practice: a multicentre, cluster randomised controlled trial.日常实践中类风湿关节炎疾病活动度系统监测的有效性:一项多中心、整群随机对照试验
Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Sep;64(9):1294-8. doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.030924. Epub 2005 Apr 13.
2
A tight control treatment strategy aiming for remission in early rheumatoid arthritis is more effective than usual care treatment in daily clinical practice: a study of two cohorts in the Dutch Rheumatoid Arthritis Monitoring registry.在荷兰类风湿关节炎监测注册中心的两个队列研究中,旨在早期缓解的严格控制治疗策略比日常临床实践中的常规治疗更有效。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Jun;71(6):845-50. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200274. Epub 2011 Dec 30.
3
Combination therapy with sulfasalazine and methotrexate is more effective than either drug alone in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with a suboptimal response to sulfasalazine: results from the double-blind placebo-controlled MASCOT study.对于对柳氮磺胺吡啶反应欠佳的类风湿关节炎患者,柳氮磺胺吡啶与甲氨蝶呤联合治疗比单用任一药物更有效:双盲安慰剂对照MASCOT研究的结果
Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Feb;66(2):235-41. doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.057133. Epub 2006 Aug 22.
4
Clinical and radiographic outcome of a treat-to-target strategy using methotrexate and intra-articular glucocorticoids with or without adalimumab induction: a 2-year investigator-initiated, double-blinded, randomised, controlled trial (OPERA).采用甲氨蝶呤和关节内糖皮质激素联合或不联合阿达木单抗诱导的靶向治疗策略的临床和影像学结果:一项由研究者发起的、双盲、随机、对照试验(OPERA),为期 2 年。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Sep;75(9):1645-53. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208166. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
5
A randomized comparative effectiveness study of oral triple therapy versus etanercept plus methotrexate in early aggressive rheumatoid arthritis: the treatment of Early Aggressive Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial.口服三联疗法与依那西普联合甲氨蝶呤治疗早期侵袭性类风湿关节炎的随机对照有效性研究:早期侵袭性类风湿关节炎治疗试验
Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Sep;64(9):2824-35. doi: 10.1002/art.34498.
6
Changes in cotherapies after initiation of disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎患者开始使用疾病修饰抗风湿药物治疗后的联合治疗变化。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Oct;63(10):1415-24. doi: 10.1002/acr.20550.
7
Maintenance of remission with combination etanercept-DMARD therapy versus DMARDs alone in active rheumatoid arthritis: results of an international treat-to-target study conducted in regions with limited biologic access.在生物制剂可及性有限的地区开展的国际达标治疗研究:依那西普联合 DMARD 治疗与单独 DMARD 治疗在活动性类风湿关节炎中维持缓解的比较。
Rheumatol Int. 2017 Sep;37(9):1469-1479. doi: 10.1007/s00296-017-3749-7. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
8
Aiming at low disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis with initial combination therapy or initial monotherapy strategies: the BeSt study.针对类风湿关节炎低疾病活动度的初始联合治疗或初始单药治疗策略:BeSt研究
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2006 Nov-Dec;24(6 Suppl 43):S-77-82.
9
A population model of early rheumatoid arthritis disease activity during treatment with methotrexate, sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine.甲氨蝶呤、柳氮磺吡啶和羟氯喹治疗早期类风湿关节炎疾病活动的人群模型
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 May;79(5):777-88. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12553.
10
Effectiveness of methotrexate with step-down glucocorticoid remission induction (COBRA Slim) versus other intensive treatment strategies for early rheumatoid arthritis in a treat-to-target approach: 1-year results of CareRA, a randomised pragmatic open-label superiority trial.甲氨蝶呤联合逐渐减停糖皮质激素缓解诱导(COBRA Slim)与其他强化治疗策略治疗靶向治疗早期类风湿关节炎的疗效比较:CareRA 随机实用开放标签优效性试验的 1 年结果。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Mar;76(3):511-520. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209212. Epub 2016 Jul 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic performance of optical spectral transmission compared to magnetic resonance imaging in patients with inflammatory arthritis.光学光谱透射与磁共振成像在炎性关节炎患者中的诊断性能比较。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2025 Jan 30;27(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13075-025-03478-y.
2
Sialic-Acid-Related Enzymes of B Cells and Monocytes as Novel Markers to Discriminate Improvement Categories and to Fulfill Two Remission Definitions in Rheumatoid Arthritis.B 细胞和单核细胞中的唾液酸相关酶作为新型标志物,可区分改善类别,并满足类风湿关节炎的两种缓解定义。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Aug 20;24(16):12998. doi: 10.3390/ijms241612998.
3
Co-Design of a Disease Activity Based Self-Management Approach for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.类风湿关节炎患者基于疾病活动度的自我管理方法的协同设计
Mediterr J Rheumatol. 2021 Mar 31;32(1):21-30. doi: 10.31138/mjr.32.1.21. eCollection 2021 Mar.
4
Longitudinal assessment of racial disparities in juvenile idiopathic arthritis disease activity in a treat-to-target intervention.在一项达标治疗干预中,对青少年特发性关节炎疾病活动中的种族差异进行纵向评估。
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2020 Nov 13;18(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12969-020-00485-y.
5
Treatment strategies are more important than drugs in the management of rheumatoid arthritis.在类风湿关节炎的治疗中,治疗策略比药物更重要。
Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Apr;39(4):1363-1368. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05001-x. Epub 2020 Feb 22.
6
Disease activity-based management of rheumatoid arthritis in Dutch daily clinical practice has improved over the past decade.在过去的十年中,荷兰日常临床实践中基于疾病活动的类风湿关节炎管理得到了改善。
Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Apr;39(4):1131-1139. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04913-7. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
7
Validity of adopting a Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index less than 0.5 as a target in elderly rheumatoid arthritis patients.采用健康评估问卷残疾指数小于 0.5 作为老年类风湿关节炎患者的目标的有效性。
Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Dec;38(12):3351-3360. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04692-1. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
8
Predicting achievement of the treatment targets at 6 months from 3-month response levels in rheumatoid arthritis: data from real-life follow-up in the NOR-DMARD study.根据类风湿关节炎3个月时的反应水平预测6个月时治疗目标的达成情况:来自NOR-DMARD研究现实生活随访的数据
RMD Open. 2018 Oct 26;4(2):e000773. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000773. eCollection 2018.
9
Challenges in Implementing Treat-to-Target Strategies in Rheumatology.实现风湿学目标治疗策略的挑战。
Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2019 Feb;45(1):101-112. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2018.09.007.
10
Novel Concepts in Psoriatic Arthritis Management: Can We Treat to Target?银屑病关节炎治疗新理念:可否靶向治疗?
Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2018 Sep 18;20(11):71. doi: 10.1007/s11926-018-0781-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Influence of guideline adherence on outcome in a randomised controlled trial on the efficacy of methotrexate with folate supplementation in rheumatoid arthritis.在一项关于甲氨蝶呤联合叶酸补充剂治疗类风湿关节炎疗效的随机对照试验中,指南依从性对结果的影响。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Oct;63(10):1222-6. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.018861.
2
Effect of a treatment strategy of tight control for rheumatoid arthritis (the TICORA study): a single-blind randomised controlled trial.类风湿关节炎严格控制治疗策略的效果(TICORA研究):一项单盲随机对照试验
Lancet. 2004;364(9430):263-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16676-2.
3
The relationship between disease activity and radiologic progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a longitudinal analysis.类风湿关节炎患者疾病活动度与放射学进展的关系:一项纵向分析。
Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Jul;50(7):2082-93. doi: 10.1002/art.20350.
4
Design and analysis of a randomized controlled trial testing the effects of clinical decision support on the management of rheumatoid arthritis.一项测试临床决策支持对类风湿关节炎管理效果的随机对照试验的设计与分析。
Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Feb 15;51(1):124-7. doi: 10.1002/art.20087.
5
Effectiveness of a measurement feedback system on outcome in rheumatoid arthritis: a controlled clinical trial.测量反馈系统对类风湿关节炎治疗效果的影响:一项对照临床试验。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2003 Jul;62(7):624-9. doi: 10.1136/ard.62.7.624.
6
The merits of monitoring: should we follow all our rheumatoid arthritis patients in daily practice?监测的益处:在日常实践中我们是否应该对所有类风湿关节炎患者进行随访?
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2002 Jun;41(6):601-4. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/41.6.601.
7
Canadian Rheumatology Association annual meeting. Mont Tremblant, Quebec, Canada. February 21-24, 2001. Abstracts.加拿大风湿病协会年会。加拿大魁北克省蒙特特里姆布兰。2001年2月21日至24日。摘要。
J Rheumatol. 2001 Jun;28(6):1413-22.
8
The relationship between disease activity, joint destruction, and functional capacity over the course of rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎病程中疾病活动度、关节破坏与功能能力之间的关系。
Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Sep;44(9):2009-17. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200109)44:9<2009::AID-ART349>3.0.CO;2-L.
9
Health Assessment Questionnaire modifications: is standardisation needed?健康评估问卷的修改:是否需要标准化?
Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 Sep;60(9):841-5.
10
Management of rheumatoid arthritis: the historical context.类风湿关节炎的管理:历史背景
J Rheumatol. 2001 Jun;28(6):1431-52.

日常实践中类风湿关节炎疾病活动度系统监测的有效性:一项多中心、整群随机对照试验

Effectiveness of systematic monitoring of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity in daily practice: a multicentre, cluster randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Fransen J, Moens H Bernelot, Speyer I, van Riel P L C M

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre Nijmegen, PO Box 9101, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Sep;64(9):1294-8. doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.030924. Epub 2005 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1136/ard.2004.030924
PMID:15829574
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1755664/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test the efficacy of standardised monitoring using the disease activity index DAS28 versus usual care on disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) prescription and disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

A 24 week cluster randomised trial. Rheumatology outpatient centres were randomised to systematic monitoring of disease activity using the DAS28 (12 centres, 205 patients) or usual care (12 centres, 179 patients). The aim for the DAS group was to reach a DAS28 score of < or =3.2 by changes in DMARD treatment, at the discretion of the rheumatologist and the patient.

RESULTS

At baseline, disease activity was the same in both groups, with an overall mean (SD) DAS28 of 4.5 (1.2); 13% of the patients had a DAS28 of < or =3.2. At 24 weeks, 31% of patients in the DAS group had a DAS28 < or =3.2, while in the usual care centres this was 16% (p = 0.028). DMARDs were changed on average in 18% of visits in the DAS centres; in the 12 usual care centres they were changed on 8% of the visits (p = 0.013). The doses of methotrexate, sulfasalazine, and corticosteroids appeared to be higher in the DAS centres than in the usual care centres, but the differences were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

In daily practice, systematic monitoring of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis may lead to more changes in DMARD treatment, resulting in a larger number of patients with low disease activity.

摘要

目的

比较使用疾病活动指数DAS28进行标准化监测与常规治疗对类风湿关节炎患者抗风湿药物(DMARD)处方及疾病活动度的影响。

方法

一项为期24周的整群随机试验。将风湿病门诊中心随机分为两组,一组采用DAS28系统监测疾病活动度(12个中心,205例患者),另一组采用常规治疗(12个中心,179例患者)。DAS组的目标是根据风湿病学家和患者的判断,通过调整DMARD治疗使DAS28评分≤3.2。

结果

基线时,两组疾病活动度相同,DAS28总体平均(标准差)为4.5(1.2);13%的患者DAS28≤3.2。24周时,DAS组31%的患者DAS28≤3.2,而常规治疗组为16%(p = 0.028)。DAS中心平均18%的就诊中调整了DMARD;12个常规治疗中心这一比例为8%(p = 0.013)。DAS中心甲氨蝶呤、柳氮磺胺吡啶和皮质类固醇的剂量似乎高于常规治疗中心,但差异无统计学意义。

结论

在日常实践中,对类风湿关节炎疾病活动度进行系统监测可能会使DMARD治疗有更多调整,从而使更多患者疾病活动度降低。