• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

法国极低体细胞评分牛群挤奶与卫生实践的专家评估研究

Expert assessment study of milking and hygiene practices characterizing very low somatic cell score herds in France.

作者信息

Chassagne M, Barnouin J, Le Guenic M

机构信息

Animal Epidemiology Research Unit, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) 63122 Saint Genès Champanelle, France.

出版信息

J Dairy Sci. 2005 May;88(5):1909-16. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72867-8.

DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72867-8
PMID:15829686
Abstract

French dairy herds were selected on a national basis through the "Zero Mastitis Objective" Program (ZMP) to display hygiene and milking practices characterizing very low somatic cell score (SCS) herds. The herds selected were stratified in 2 groups. The first group (LOW) included 187 herds within the first 5 percentiles of herds regarding mean SCS for the 36 mo preceding ZMP (36-mo SCS). The second group (MED) included 117 herds within the 50 to 55th percentile of herds regarding 36-mo SCS. Mean milk SCS was 3.09 in the MED herds vs. 1.99 in the LOW herds, which corresponded to 265,000 and 135,000 cells/mL respectively. Moreover, LOW and MED herds did not change from one SCS category to another during ZMP. Potentially explanatory variables, collected by formally trained dairy management experts through observations from attendance at milking and farm visits, were analyzed using multistep logistic regression models. According to final model and expert observations, the probability for a herd to belong to the LOW group was maximized when: 1) winter cleanliness of dry cow shed was good; 2) use of teat spraying was carried out; and 3) California Mastitis Tests were performed at milking. Moreover, the herd probability of belonging to the MED group was maximized when: 1) air admission at teat cup attachment was observed during milking; 2) winter cleanliness of dry cow shed was poor; and 3) the milker spent time during milking to feed calves. Finally, the study highlighted milking and hygiene variables and attitudes appearing as key practices to control herd SCS through precise and safe milking and more attention paid to individual animals and cleanliness of dry cow shed.

摘要

法国奶牛群是通过“零乳腺炎目标”计划(ZMP)在全国范围内挑选出来的,以展示具有极低体细胞评分(SCS)的奶牛群的卫生和挤奶做法。挑选出的牛群被分为两组。第一组(LOW)包括187个牛群,这些牛群在ZMP之前36个月(36个月SCS)的平均SCS处于所有牛群的前5百分位。第二组(MED)包括117个牛群,这些牛群在36个月SCS方面处于所有牛群的第50至55百分位。MED组牛群的平均牛奶SCS为3.09,而LOW组为1.99,分别对应于每毫升265,000个和135,000个细胞。此外,在ZMP期间,LOW组和MED组的牛群没有从一个SCS类别转变为另一个类别。由经过正式培训的奶牛管理专家通过观察挤奶过程和农场访问收集的潜在解释变量,使用多步逻辑回归模型进行了分析。根据最终模型和专家观察,当满足以下条件时,牛群属于LOW组的概率最大:1)干奶牛舍冬季清洁良好;2)进行了乳头喷雾;3)挤奶时进行了加利福尼亚乳腺炎检测。此外,当满足以下条件时,牛群属于MED组的概率最大:1)挤奶时观察到乳头杯连接处有空气进入;2)干奶牛舍冬季清洁较差;3)挤奶工在挤奶时花时间喂小牛。最后,该研究强调了挤奶和卫生变量以及态度,这些似乎是通过精确和安全的挤奶以及更多关注个体动物和干奶牛舍清洁来控制牛群体细胞评分的关键做法。

相似文献

1
Expert assessment study of milking and hygiene practices characterizing very low somatic cell score herds in France.法国极低体细胞评分牛群挤奶与卫生实践的专家评估研究
J Dairy Sci. 2005 May;88(5):1909-16. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72867-8.
2
Management practices from questionnaire surveys in herds with very low somatic cell score through a national mastitis program in France.通过法国一项全国性乳腺炎防治计划,对体细胞评分极低的牛群进行问卷调查得出的管理措施。
J Dairy Sci. 2004 Nov;87(11):3989-99. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73539-0.
3
Dairy management practices associated with incidence rate of clinical mastitis in low somatic cell score herds in France.法国低体细胞评分牛群中与临床乳腺炎发病率相关的奶牛管理实践
J Dairy Sci. 2005 Oct;88(10):3700-9. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)73056-3.
4
Mastitis control practices: differences between herds with high and low milk somatic cell counts.乳腺炎防控措施:高、低乳体细胞计数牛群之间的差异
J Dairy Sci. 1990 Apr;73(4):1135-43. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(90)78774-7.
5
Herd management and prevalence of mastitis in dairy herds with high and low somatic cell counts.体细胞数高和低的奶牛群中乳腺炎的群体管理与流行情况
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1987 Jun 1;190(11):1411-6.
6
Risk factors for bulk milk somatic cell counts and total bacterial counts in smallholder dairy farms in the 10th region of Chile.智利第10大区小农户奶牛场散装牛奶体细胞计数和细菌总数的风险因素
Prev Vet Med. 2005 Jan;67(1):1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2004.10.002. Epub 2004 Dec 19.
7
Factors associated with high milk test day somatic cell counts in large dairy herds in Brandenburg. I: Housing conditions.勃兰登堡大型奶牛场中与高牛奶测定日体细胞计数相关的因素。I:饲养条件。
J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med. 2006 Apr;53(3):134-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0442.2006.00801.x.
8
Factors associated with high milk test day somatic cell counts in large dairy herds in Brandenburg. II. Milking practices.勃兰登堡大型奶牛场中与高泌乳期体细胞计数相关的因素。II. 挤奶操作
J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med. 2006 May;53(4):209-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0442.2006.00814.x.
9
Management practices associated with the incidence rate of clinical mastitis.与临床乳腺炎发病率相关的管理措施。
J Dairy Sci. 1999 Aug;82(8):1643-54. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75393-2.
10
Economic analysis of a mastitis monitoring and control program in four dairy herds.四个奶牛场乳腺炎监测与控制项目的经济分析
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1993 Feb 15;202(4):540-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations between on-farm factors and bulk tank SCC on Irish dairy farms.爱尔兰奶牛场的农场因素与奶罐体细胞计数之间的关联。
Ir Vet J. 2025 Jul 7;78(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13620-025-00300-8.
2
Exploring the heights: Impact of altitude on dairy milk composition.探索高度:海拔对牛奶成分的影响。
JDS Commun. 2023 Nov 17;5(2):139-143. doi: 10.3168/jdsc.2023-0448. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Associations between milking practices, somatic cell counts and milk postharvest losses in smallholder dairy and pastoral camel herds in Kenya.
肯尼亚小农户奶牛和游牧骆驼群的挤奶方式、体细胞计数与产后牛奶损失之间的关联。
Int J Vet Sci Med. 2017 Apr 12;5(1):57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijvsm.2017.01.001. eCollection 2017 Jun.
4
Farm management factors associated with bulk tank somatic cell count in Irish dairy herds.与爱尔兰奶牛场牛奶体细胞计数相关的农场管理因素。
Ir Vet J. 2009 Apr 1;62 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S45-51. doi: 10.1186/2046-0481-62-S4-S45.