Kim Daeho, Kim Kwang-iel, Lee Haewon, Choi Joonho, Park Yong-Chon
Department of Neuropsychiatry, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.
J Korean Med Sci. 2005 Apr;20(2):302-6. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2005.20.2.302.
The Illness Intrusiveness Rating Scale (IIRS) measures illness-induced disruptions to 13 domains of lifestyles, activities, and interests. A stable three-factor structure has been well documented; however, the cross-cultural validity of this scale needs to be tested. This study investigated the factor structure of the Korean version of IIRS in 712 outpatients at a university medical center. A predominant diagnosis of the patients was rheumatoid arthritis (47%). The Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D), and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) were also administered. Exploratory Principal Component Analysis identified a two-factor structure, "Relationships and Personal Development (RPD)" and "Instrumental", accounting for 57% of the variance. Confirmatory analyses extracted an identical factor structure. However, a goodness-of-the fit test failed to support two-factor solution (chi(2)=138.2, df=43, p<.001). Two factors had high internal consistency (RPD, alpha=.89; Instrumental, alpha=.75) and significantly correlated with scores of HAQ (RPD, r=.53, p<.001; Instrumental, .r=44, p<.001) and CES-D (RPD, .r=55, p<.001; Instrumental, .r=43, p<.001). These findings supported construct validity of the Korean version of IIRS, but did not support cross-cultural equivalence of the factor structure.
疾病侵扰评定量表(IIRS)用于衡量疾病对生活方式、活动和兴趣的13个领域所造成的干扰。已充分证明其具有稳定的三因素结构;然而,该量表的跨文化效度有待检验。本研究调查了某大学医学中心712名门诊患者的韩语版IIRS的因素结构。患者的主要诊断为类风湿性关节炎(47%)。还使用了流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)和健康评估问卷(HAQ)。探索性主成分分析确定了一个两因素结构,即“人际关系与个人发展(RPD)”和“工具性”,解释了57%的方差。验证性分析提取了相同的因素结构。然而,拟合优度检验不支持两因素解决方案(卡方=138.2,自由度=43,p<.001)。两个因素具有较高的内部一致性(RPD,α=.89;工具性,α=.75),并与HAQ得分(RPD,r=.53,p<.001;工具性,r=.44,p<.001)和CES-D得分(RPD,r=.55,p<.001;工具性,r=.43,p<.001)显著相关。这些发现支持了韩语版IIRS的结构效度,但不支持因素结构的跨文化等效性。