• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[含抗生素骨水泥一期感染性关节置换翻修术的早期结果。临床与统计学分析]

[Early results of one-stage septic revision arthroplasties with antibiotic-laden cement. A clinical and statistical analysis].

作者信息

Sofer D, Regenbrecht B, Pfeil J

机构信息

Chirurgische Klinik II, Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Klinikum Darmstadt, Darmstadt.

出版信息

Orthopade. 2005 Jun;34(6):592-602. doi: 10.1007/s00132-005-0780-2.

DOI:10.1007/s00132-005-0780-2
PMID:15834702
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic infections will generally require revision arthroplasty. The one-stage revision arthroplasty with antibiotic-laden cement is hence an attractive therapeutic option, since it only requires one operation, has a low morbidity and, if successful, is cost-efficient.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed one-stage revision arthroplasties. The exchanged prostheses were fixed with antibiotic-laden cement after biotic resistance was determined. All patients were treated with postoperative systemic antibiotics.

RESULTS

After a mean postoperative examination period of 18.4 months, we confirmed eradication of infection in 14 of 15 knee joints and in 15 of 16 hip joints. The mean duration of hospital stay was 23 days. Patients' satisfaction was high (93.55%) and the clinical results were satisfactory.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis shows that our low early reinfection rate (6.45%) is within statistical expectation. Furthermore, we have showed that there is evidence to suggest that the rate of successful outcomes in one-stage revision arthroplasties, at least at the hip, is not different from the rate of two-stage revision arthroplasties and that the difference may be interpreted as stochastic deviation (p=0.264494). According to existing studies, an analogy to knee arthroplasties can be assumed. We demonstrated that one-stage revision is an adequate therapeutic option if patients are carefully selected and under the supervision of an experienced surgeon.

摘要

背景

人工关节周围感染通常需要进行关节置换翻修手术。因此,使用含抗生素骨水泥的一期关节置换翻修手术是一种有吸引力的治疗选择,因为它只需要一次手术,发病率低,而且如果成功,成本效益高。

材料与方法

我们进行了一期关节置换翻修手术。在确定生物抗性后,用含抗生素骨水泥固定更换的假体。所有患者术后均接受全身抗生素治疗。

结果

术后平均检查期为18.4个月,我们证实15个膝关节中的14个以及16个髋关节中的15个感染已消除。平均住院时间为23天。患者满意度较高(93.55%),临床结果令人满意。

结论

我们的分析表明,我们较低的早期再感染率(6.45%)在统计学预期范围内。此外,我们已表明,有证据表明一期关节置换翻修手术的成功结果率,至少在髋关节方面,与二期关节置换翻修手术的成功率没有差异,且这种差异可解释为随机偏差(p = 0.264494)。根据现有研究,可以假定膝关节置换手术也类似。我们证明,如果仔细选择患者并在经验丰富的外科医生监督下,一期翻修是一种合适的治疗选择。

相似文献

1
[Early results of one-stage septic revision arthroplasties with antibiotic-laden cement. A clinical and statistical analysis].[含抗生素骨水泥一期感染性关节置换翻修术的早期结果。临床与统计学分析]
Orthopade. 2005 Jun;34(6):592-602. doi: 10.1007/s00132-005-0780-2.
2
Two-Stage Revision for Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty: Based on Autoclaving the Recycled Femoral Component and Intraoperative Molding Using Antibiotic-Impregnated Cement on the Tibial Side.感染性全膝关节置换术的两阶段翻修:基于对回收股骨组件进行高压灭菌以及在胫骨侧使用抗生素骨水泥进行术中塑形。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2015 Sep;7(3):310-7. doi: 10.4055/cios.2015.7.3.310. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
3
Use of modular megaprosthesis in managing chronic end-stage periprosthetic hip and knee infections: Is there an increase in relapse rate?使用模块化大假体治疗慢性终末期人工髋关节和膝关节感染:复发率会增加吗?
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 May;28(4):627-636. doi: 10.1007/s00590-018-2127-9. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
4
[Two-stage revision of infected total knee arthroplasty using antibiotic-impregnated articulating cement spacer].[使用含抗生素的可活动骨水泥间隔物对感染性全膝关节置换术进行两阶段翻修]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Oct;26(10):1169-73.
5
Antibiotics-impregnated cement spacers in the first step of two-stage revision for infected totally replaced hip joints: report of ten trial cases.抗生素骨水泥间隔物在感染性全髋关节置换二期翻修第一步中的应用:10例试验病例报告
J Orthop Sci. 2009 Nov;14(6):704-10. doi: 10.1007/s00776-009-1406-z. Epub 2009 Dec 8.
6
Two-stage revision arthroplasty for management of chronic periprosthetic hip and knee infection: techniques, controversies, and outcomes.两阶段翻修术治疗慢性人工髋关节和膝关节感染:技术、争议和结果。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014 Mar;22(3):153-64. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-22-03-153.
7
Antibiotic-laden Bone Cement in Primary and Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.抗生素骨水泥在初次及翻修髋关节和膝关节置换术中的应用。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018 Oct 15;26(20):727-734. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00305.
8
Bioavailability of gentamicin and vancomycin released from an antibiotic containing bone cement in patients undergoing a septic one-stage total hip arthroplasty (THA) revision: a monocentric open clinical trial.在接受感染性一期全髋关节置换术(THA)翻修的患者中,含抗生素骨水泥释放的庆大霉素和万古霉素的生物利用度:一项单中心开放性临床试验。
Hip Int. 2016 Jan-Feb;26(1):90-6. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000307. Epub 2015 Oct 6.
9
One-stage exchange arthroplasty for chronic periprosthetic hip infection: results of a large prospective cohort study.一期髋关节置换术治疗慢性髋关节假体周围感染:一项大型前瞻性队列研究的结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Jan 1;96(1):e1. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01451.
10
Similar risk of complete revision for infection with single-dose versus multiple-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in primary arthroplasty of the hip and knee: results of an observational cohort study in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register in 242,179 patients.在荷兰关节置换登记处的 242179 名患者中,进行单剂量与多剂量抗生素预防用药的初次髋关节和膝关节置换术,感染后行全翻修的风险相似:一项观察性队列研究的结果。
Acta Orthop. 2020 Dec;91(6):794-800. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1794096. Epub 2020 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Antibiotic bone cement's effect on infection rates in primary and revision total knee arthroplasties.抗生素骨水泥对初次和翻修全膝关节置换术感染率的影响。
World J Orthop. 2017 Dec 18;8(12):946-955. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v8.i12.946.
2
Can Good Infection Control Be Obtained in One-stage Exchange of the Infected TKA to a Rotating Hinge Design? 10-year Results.在一期将感染的全膝关节置换术(TKA)转换为旋转铰链设计时能否实现良好的感染控制?10年随访结果。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jan;474(1):81-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4408-5.
3
Is single-stage revision according to a strict protocol effective in treatment of chronic knee arthroplasty infections?

本文引用的文献

1
Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis.丙烯酸假体髋关节置换术的功能结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1954 Jun;36-A(3):451-75.
2
[Pyogenic infection after joint replacement operations: incidence and economic effects].[关节置换手术后的化脓性感染:发病率及经济影响]
Kongressbd Dtsch Ges Chir Kongr. 2002;119:738-42.
3
Mechanical characteristics of antibiotic-laden bone cement.载抗生素骨水泥的力学特性。
按照严格方案进行的单阶段翻修术治疗慢性膝关节置换感染是否有效?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jan;473(1):8-14. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3721-8.
4
Periprosthetic knee infection: ten strategies that work.人工膝关节感染:十种有效的策略。
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2013 Dec;25(4):155-64. doi: 10.5792/ksrr.2013.25.4.155. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
5
Patient reported outcome measures after revision of the infected TKR: comparison of single versus two-stage revision.翻修感染性 TKR 后患者报告的结局测量指标:单阶段与双阶段翻修的比较。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Dec;21(12):2713-20. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2090-7. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
6
Two-stage revision of septic knee prosthesis with articulating knee spacers yields better infection eradication rate than one-stage or two-stage revision with static spacers.关节型膝关节间隔物的两阶段翻修比单阶段或两阶段翻修使用静态间隔物能更好地清除感染。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Dec;20(12):2445-53. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-1885-x. Epub 2012 Jan 21.
7
High rate of infection control with one-stage revision of septic knee prostheses excluding MRSA and MRSE.一期翻修治疗感染性膝关节假体,不包括耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和耐甲氧西林表皮葡萄球菌,感染控制率高。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 May;470(5):1461-71. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2174-6. Epub 2011 Nov 12.
8
[Revision strategy for periprosthetic infection].[人工关节周围感染的翻修策略]
Orthopade. 2009 Aug;38(8):681-8. doi: 10.1007/s00132-009-1434-6.
Acta Orthop Scand. 2002 Dec;73(6):688-90. doi: 10.1080/000164702321039697.
4
Joint prosthetic infections: a success story.人工关节感染:一个成功案例。
Acta Orthop Scand. 2001 Dec;72(6):553-6. doi: 10.1080/000164701317268969.
5
[The infected endoprosthesis with the example of the hip joint endoprosthesis. An increasing danger to patient and society].[以髋关节假体为例的感染性假体。对患者和社会的危害日益增加]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2001 Apr;95(3):195-201.
6
Primary total hip arthroplasty after infection.感染后的初次全髋关节置换术。
Instr Course Lect. 2001;50:317-33.
7
Limited role of direct exchange arthroplasty in the treatment of infected total hip replacements.直接置换关节成形术在感染性全髋关节置换治疗中的作用有限。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000 Dec(381):101-5. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200012000-00012.
8
Two-stage uncemented revision hip arthroplasty for infection.两阶段非骨水泥型髋关节翻修术治疗感染
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000 Jul;82(5):689-94. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.82b5.9668.
9
One-stage revision surgery of the infected hip. A minimum 10-year followup study.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999 Dec(369):139-43. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199912000-00014.
10
One-stage exchange in the treatment of the infected total hip arthroplasty.
Semin Arthroplasty. 1994 Jul;5(3):137-41.