Martins Isabel P, Gouveia Raquel G, Parreira Elsa
Centro de Estudos Egas Moniz, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Lisbon Faculty of Medicine, Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisboa, Portugal.
Headache. 2005 Mar;45(3):190-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2005.05043.x.
Some patients with otherwise typical cluster headache (CH) have persistent attacks free of cranial autonomic symptoms (CAS). The factors responsible for this atypical presentation are not known.
To identify factors associated to the absence of CAS in patients with CH.
A prospective series of 157 patients with the diagnosis of CH was analyzed, comparing 148 typical CH patients with 9 CH patients without CAS.
Patients without CAS reported significantly less intense attacks (P = .003) when compared to those with CAS. There was also a tendency (not reaching statistical significance) for a higher frequency of females and chronic CH among those without CAS. Otherwise, there were no differences between the two groups (in age, duration of illness, follow-up time, attack duration or frequency, nor side or site of pain). A logistic regression analysis showed that only pain intensity could explain the difference between the two groups, since the other explanatory variables were also associated with different intensity of attacks.
These results support the hypothesis that CH without cranial autonomic symptoms represents a milder form of CH.
一些患有典型丛集性头痛(CH)的患者会出现无颅自主神经症状(CAS)的持续性发作。导致这种非典型表现的因素尚不清楚。
确定与丛集性头痛患者无颅自主神经症状相关的因素。
对157例诊断为丛集性头痛的患者进行前瞻性系列分析,将148例典型丛集性头痛患者与9例无颅自主神经症状的丛集性头痛患者进行比较。
与有颅自主神经症状的患者相比,无颅自主神经症状的患者报告的发作强度明显较低(P = 0.003)。无颅自主神经症状的患者中女性和慢性丛集性头痛的发生率也有升高趋势(未达到统计学意义)。除此之外,两组之间在年龄、病程、随访时间、发作持续时间或频率、疼痛部位或疼痛侧别方面均无差异。逻辑回归分析表明,只有疼痛强度可以解释两组之间的差异,因为其他解释变量也与不同的发作强度相关联。
这些结果支持了无颅自主神经症状的丛集性头痛代表丛集性头痛较轻形式的假说。