Vos Jan Albert, Vos A W Floris, Linsen Matteus A M, Marcus J Tim, Overtoom Timotheus Th C, van den Berg Jos C, Wisselink Willem
Department of Interventional Radiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
J Vasc Surg. 2005 Mar;41(3):469-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.12.033.
Because stents can cause vessel angulation during movement, we hypothesized that internal carotid artery (ICA) stents might lead to alterations of cerebropetal blood flow. This study assessed three-dimensional anatomy and volumetric flow rate (VFR) in the ICA in various head positions by comparing patients treated with carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) with patients treated with carotid endarterectomy (CEA).
Three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and magnetic resonance flow quantification were performed on six subjects after CAS (median age, 70 years) and on six subjects after CEA (median age, 67 years). All investigations were performed in five head positions: neutral, bent forward, bent backward, and turned to the treated, ipsilateral side and to the contralateral side. Maximum-intensity projection reconstructions were obtained to measure maximal angulation of the ICA in the forward, backward, ipsilateral, and contralateral positions compared with neutral. Subsequently, the plane perpendicular to the ICA, 1 cm distal to the stent or 4 cm distal to the carotid bifurcation (CEA patients), was established. The VFR through this plane was measured for each position, and the forward, backward, ipsilateral, and contralateral positions were compared with neutral.
In CAS patients, there was a median change in ICA angulation of +10.2 degrees (interquartile range, +7.3 degrees to +17.9 degrees ) in the forward position, compared with +0.2 degrees (-1.0 degrees to +2.4 degrees ) in CEA patients ( P = .016). In all other head positions, there was no statistically significant difference in angulation change. There was no statistically significant difference in VFR change between groups in any of the head positions tested.
There was a significant increase in ICA angulation in CAS patients if the head was bent forward; this was not observed in CEA patients. This angulation change did not lead to significant acute changes in cerebropetal blood flow, but it might have chronic effects not yet tested.
由于支架在移动过程中可导致血管成角,我们推测颈内动脉(ICA)支架可能会导致向脑血流的改变。本研究通过比较接受颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术(CAS)的患者与接受颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的患者,评估了不同头部位置时ICA的三维解剖结构和容积流率(VFR)。
对6例CAS术后患者(中位年龄70岁)和6例CEA术后患者(中位年龄67岁)进行三维时间飞跃磁共振血管造影和磁共振血流定量分析。所有检查均在5种头部位置进行:中立位、向前弯曲、向后弯曲、转向治疗侧同侧和转向对侧。获得最大强度投影重建图像,以测量与中立位相比,ICA在向前、向后、同侧和对侧位置的最大成角。随后,在距支架远端1 cm或距颈动脉分叉(CEA患者)远端4 cm处建立垂直于ICA的平面。测量每个位置通过该平面的VFR,并将向前、向后、同侧和对侧位置与中立位进行比较。
在向前位置,CAS患者的ICA成角中位数变化为+10.2度(四分位间距,+7.3度至+17.9度),而CEA患者为+0.2度(-1.0度至+2.4度)(P = 0.016)。在所有其他头部位置,成角变化无统计学显著差异。在任何测试的头部位置,两组之间的VFR变化均无统计学显著差异。
如果头部向前弯曲,CAS患者的ICA成角显著增加;CEA患者未观察到这种情况。这种成角变化未导致向脑血流的显著急性变化,但可能有尚未测试的慢性影响。