Sambuceti Gianmario, Marzilli Mario, Mari Andrea, Marini Cecilia, Schluter Mathis, Testa Roberto, Papini Michaela, Marraccini Paolo, Ciriello Giuseppe, Marzullo Paolo, L'Abbate Antonio
Institute of Clinical Physiology, Italian National Research Council, Pisa, Italy.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005 May;288(5):H2298-305. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00870.2004.
The classical model of coronary physiology implies the presence of maximal microcirculatory vasodilation during myocardial ischemia. However, Doppler monitoring of coronary blood flow (CBF) documented severe microcirculatory vasoconstriction during pacing-induced ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease. This study investigates the mechanisms that underlie this paradoxical behavior in nine patients with stable angina and single-vessel coronary disease who were candidates for stenting. While transstenotic pressures were continuously monitored, input CBF (in ml/min) to the poststenotic myocardium was measured by Doppler catheter and angiographic cross-sectional area. Simultaneously, specific myocardial blood flow (MBF, in ml.min(-1).g(-1)) was measured by 133Xe washout. Perfused tissue mass was calculated as CBF/MBF. Measurements were obtained at baseline, during pacing-induced ischemia, and after stenting. CBF and distal coronary pressure values were also measured during pacing with intracoronary adenosine administration. During pacing, CBF decreased to 64 +/- 24% of baseline and increased to 265 +/- 100% of ischemic flow after adenosine administration. In contrast, pacing increased MBF to 184 +/- 66% of baseline, measured as a function of the increased rate-pressure product (r = 0.69; P < 0.05). Thus, during pacing, perfused myocardial mass drastically decreased from 30 +/- 23 to 12 +/- 11 g (P < 0.01). Distal coronary pressure remained stable during pacing but decreased after adenosine administration. Stenting increased perfused myocardial mass to 39 +/- 23 g (P < 0.05 vs. baseline) as a function of the increase in distal coronary pressure (r = 0.71; P < 0.02). In conclusion, the vasoconstrictor response to pacing-induced ischemia is heterogeneously distributed and excludes a tissue fraction from perfusion. Within perfused tissue, the metabolic demand still controls the vasomotor tone.
冠状动脉生理学的经典模型表明,在心肌缺血期间存在最大程度的微循环血管舒张。然而,对冠状动脉疾病患者在起搏诱导的缺血期间进行的冠状动脉血流(CBF)多普勒监测记录到严重的微循环血管收缩。本研究调查了9例稳定型心绞痛且单支冠状动脉疾病、适合进行支架置入术患者中这种矛盾行为背后的机制。在持续监测跨狭窄压力的同时,通过多普勒导管和血管造影截面积测量进入狭窄后心肌的输入CBF(以ml/min为单位)。同时,通过133Xe洗脱测量特定心肌血流量(MBF,以ml·min-1·g-1为单位)。灌注组织质量计算为CBF/MBF。在基线、起搏诱导的缺血期间和支架置入术后进行测量。在冠状动脉内给予腺苷起搏期间也测量了CBF和冠状动脉远端压力值。起搏期间,CBF降至基线的64±24%,在给予腺苷后增加至缺血血流的265±100%。相比之下,起搏使MBF增加至基线的184±66%,作为心率-压力乘积增加的函数测量(r = 0.69;P < 0.05)。因此,起搏期间,灌注心肌质量从30±23 g急剧降至12±11 g(P < 0.01)。冠状动脉远端压力在起搏期间保持稳定,但在给予腺苷后降低。支架置入术使灌注心肌质量增加至39±23 g(与基线相比,P < 0.05),作为冠状动脉远端压力增加的函数(r = 0.71;P < 0.02)。总之,对起搏诱导的缺血的血管收缩反应分布不均,使一部分组织无法得到灌注。在灌注组织内,代谢需求仍控制着血管舒缩张力。