Lee S-D, Yu M-L, Cheng P-N, Lai M-Y, Chao Y-C, Hwang S-J, Chang W-Y, Chang T-T, Hsieh T-Y, Liu C-J, Chen D-S
Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei 100, Taiwan.
J Viral Hepat. 2005 May;12(3):283-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2005.00590.x.
Previous studies in Caucasian patients showed treatment of chronic hepatitis C with pegylated interferon/ribavirin was well tolerated, and produced a higher response rate especially in genotype 1 infections. However, it is unknown whether this conclusion can be extrapolated to patients with Chinese ethnic origin. A total of 153 patients with biopsy-proven chronic hepatitis C were randomly assigned to receive either weekly injection of peginterferon alpha-2b 1.5 mcg/kg plus oral ribavirin (1000 or 1200 mg/day, depending on body weight) (PEG group, n = 76) or 3 MU of interferon alpha-2b t.i.w. plus ribavirin (IFN group, n = 77) for 24 weeks. Sustained virological response (SVR) was defined as the sustained disappearance of serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA at 24 weeks after the end of treatment by polymerase chain reaction assay. Baseline demographic, viral and histological characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Using an intent-to-treat analysis, HCV genotype 1 patients showed a significantly higher SVR in patients receiving PEG-IFN rather than IFN (65.8%vs 41.0%, P = 0.019), but no difference was found in genotype non-1 patients (PEG vs IFN: 68.4%vs 86.8%, P = 0.060). Genotype 1 patients (28.6%) in the PEG-IFN group relapsed, as compared with 52.9% in the IFN group (P = 0.040). Multivariate analyses showed early virological response at week 12 of therapy and genotype non-1 were significant predictors to SVR. As compared with the IFN group, patients receiving PEG-IFN had a significantly higher rate of discontinuation, dose reduction, fever, headache, insomnia, leucopenia and thrombocytopenia. In genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C Chinese patient, PEG-IFNalpha2b ribavirin had significantly better SVR and lower relapse rate when compared to IFN/ribavirin. Both regimens can be recommended for genotype non-1 chronic hepatitis C Chinese patients. However, a higher rate of adverse events and discontinuance of therapy were noted in patients treated with PEG-IFNalpha2b ribavirin.
此前针对高加索患者的研究表明,聚乙二醇化干扰素/利巴韦林治疗慢性丙型肝炎耐受性良好,尤其是在基因1型感染患者中产生了更高的应答率。然而,这一结论是否能外推至中国裔患者尚不清楚。总共153例经活检证实为慢性丙型肝炎的患者被随机分配接受治疗,其中一组每周注射聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2b 1.5 mcg/kg加口服利巴韦林(根据体重为1000或1200 mg/天)(聚乙二醇组,n = 76),另一组接受干扰素α-2b 3 MU,每周三次加利巴韦林(干扰素组,n = 77),疗程为24周。持续病毒学应答(SVR)定义为治疗结束后24周通过聚合酶链反应检测血清丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)RNA持续消失。两组患者的基线人口统计学、病毒学和组织学特征具有可比性。采用意向性分析,基因1型HCV患者接受聚乙二醇化干扰素治疗的SVR显著高于接受干扰素治疗的患者(65.8%对41.0%,P = 0.019),但基因非1型患者未发现差异(聚乙二醇组对干扰素组:68.4%对86.8%,P = 0.060)。聚乙二醇化干扰素组的基因1型患者复发率为28.6%,而干扰素组为52.9%(P = 0.040)。多因素分析显示,治疗第12周的早期病毒学应答和基因非1型是SVR的显著预测因素。与干扰素组相比,接受聚乙二醇化干扰素治疗的患者停药、减量、发热、头痛、失眠、白细胞减少和血小板减少的发生率显著更高。在基因1型慢性丙型肝炎中国患者中,与干扰素/利巴韦林相比,聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2b联合利巴韦林的SVR显著更好,复发率更低。两种方案均可推荐用于基因非1型慢性丙型肝炎中国患者。然而,聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2b联合利巴韦林治疗的患者不良事件发生率和治疗中断率更高。