Luno José, Praga Manuel, de Vinuesa Soledad García
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranón, c/ Dr. Esquerdo 46, 28007 Madrid, Spain.
Curr Pharm Des. 2005;11(10):1291-300. doi: 10.2174/1381612053507413.
Hypertension and proteinuria are risk factors for renal disease progression. There is clear evidence that pharmacological blockade of the RAS with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) reduces proteinuria and slows down the progression of renal disease in diabetic and non diabetic nephropathies, a beneficial effect not related to blood pressure control. However, not all patients respond similarly to these treatments. Some patients exhibit a significant beneficial response while others do not. The absence of response may be explained by the incomplete blockade of the RAS obtained with ACEI, which are unable to block completely the formation of AII, some generation of AII is produced via other non ACE pathways. In the search of new alternatives that could improve the antiproteinuric and nephroprotective effects of RAS blockers, the association of ACEI and ARB might prove to be useful. ARB produces a complete blockade of the RAS and stimulates the vasodilating and non-proliferative actions of AII via the AT-2 receptor. Furthermore, ACE inhibitors but not ARB; inhibit the metabolism of kinins, which increases the level of bradykinin, a potent vasodilator. Recently, several authors have shown a more marked antiproteinuric effect of the dual blockade of the RAS versus ACEI or ARB alone in spite of a similar effect on blood pressure. A recent study also has demonstrated that this more marked antiproteinuric effect is associated with a less progression of renal disease in primary, non diabetic nephropathies. Furthermore, at least two studies have shown that, treatment with ARB postpones end-stage renal disease and reduces the rate of decline in renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy, but until now, there is not any clear evidence of a superior beneficial effect of dual blockade versus maximal recommended dose of ARB regarding renal progression in type 2 diabetic nephropathy, which is the most frequent cause of end stage renal disease. Long-term clinical trials are needed and encouraged to further establish the significant role of dual blockade in renal protection particularly in diabetic nephropathy.
高血压和蛋白尿是肾脏疾病进展的危险因素。有明确证据表明,使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)对肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)进行药物阻断可减少蛋白尿,并减缓糖尿病和非糖尿病肾病患者的肾脏疾病进展,这种有益作用与血压控制无关。然而,并非所有患者对这些治疗的反应都相似。一些患者表现出显著的有益反应,而另一些患者则不然。无反应可能是由于ACEI对RAS的阻断不完全所致,ACEI无法完全阻断血管紧张素II(AII)的形成,一些AII是通过其他非ACE途径产生的。在寻找能够改善RAS阻滞剂的抗蛋白尿和肾脏保护作用的新替代方法时,ACEI与ARB联合使用可能会被证明是有用的。ARB可完全阻断RAS,并通过AT-2受体刺激AII的血管舒张和非增殖作用。此外,ACE抑制剂而非ARB可抑制激肽的代谢,从而增加强效血管舒张剂缓激肽的水平。最近,几位作者表明,与单独使用ACEI或ARB相比,双重阻断RAS对蛋白尿的作用更为显著,尽管对血压的影响相似。最近一项研究还表明,这种更显著的抗蛋白尿作用与原发性非糖尿病肾病患者肾脏疾病进展较慢有关。此外,至少有两项研究表明,ARB治疗可延缓2型糖尿病肾病患者终末期肾病的发生,并降低其肾功能下降速率,但到目前为止,尚无明确证据表明在2型糖尿病肾病(这是终末期肾病最常见的病因)的肾脏进展方面,双重阻断RAS比最大推荐剂量的ARB具有更优越的有益效果。需要并鼓励进行长期临床试验,以进一步确定双重阻断RAS在肾脏保护中的重要作用,尤其是在糖尿病肾病中。