Chase H Peter, Beck Roy, Tamborlane William, Buckingham Bruce, Mauras Nelly, Tsalikian Eva, Wysocki Tim, Weinzimer Stuart, Kollman Craig, Ruedy Katrina, Xing Dongyuan
DirecNet Coordinating Center, Jaeb Center for Health Research, 15310 Amberly Drive, Suite 350, Tampa, FL 33647, USA.
Diabetes Care. 2005 May;28(5):1101-6. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.5.1101.
This study assesses whether use of the GlucoWatch G2 Biographer (GW2B) in addition to standard glucose monitoring lowers HbA(1c) and reduces hypoglycemia compared with standard glucose monitoring alone.
In all, 200 subjects aged 7 to <18 years with type 1 diabetes were randomly assigned at five centers to standard glucose monitoring (usual care) or standard glucose monitoring plus GW2B use for 6 months. Study outcomes included HbA(1c) values obtained at 6 months and occurrence of severe hypoglycemia.
The mean HbA(1c) at baseline was 8.0% in both groups; at 6 months, HbA(1c) was 7.9% in the usual care group and 8.1% in the GW2B group (95% CI for mean reduction in the GW2B group compared with the usual care group -0.4 to 0.1%; P = 0.15). A decrease in HbA(1c) of > or =0.5% was achieved in 21% of the usual care group and 28% of the GW2B group (P = 0.29). Severe hypoglycemia events occurred in 7% of the GW2B group and in 2% of the usual care group (P = 0.10). In the GW2B group, sensor use declined throughout the study from a mean value of 2.1 times/week in the 1st month to 1.5 times/week in the 6th month. Reasons given for declining use included skin irritation (76%), frequent skips (56%), excessive alarms (47%), and inaccurate readings (33%).
Use of the GW2B in addition to standard glucose monitoring did not improve glycemic control or reduce the frequency of severe hypoglycemia. Skin reactions and other problems led to decreasing sensor use over time.
本研究评估与单独使用标准血糖监测相比,在标准血糖监测基础上使用GlucoWatch G2生物记录仪(GW2B)是否能降低糖化血红蛋白(HbA₁c)水平并减少低血糖发生。
总共200名年龄在7至18岁以下的1型糖尿病患者在五个中心被随机分配至标准血糖监测组(常规护理)或标准血糖监测加GW2B使用组,为期6个月。研究结果包括6个月时获得的HbA₁c值以及严重低血糖的发生情况。
两组基线时的平均HbA₁c均为8.0%;6个月时,常规护理组的HbA₁c为7.9%,GW2B组为8.1%(GW2B组与常规护理组相比平均降低的95%置信区间为-0.4%至0.1%;P = 0.15)。常规护理组21%的患者和GW2B组28%的患者HbA₁c降低≥0.5%(P = 0.29)。GW2B组7%的患者发生严重低血糖事件,常规护理组为2%(P = 0.10)。在GW2B组,整个研究过程中传感器的使用频率从第1个月的平均每周2.1次降至第6个月的每周1.5次。使用频率下降的原因包括皮肤刺激(76%)、频繁跳过(56%)、警报过多(47%)和读数不准确(33%)。
在标准血糖监测基础上使用GW2B并未改善血糖控制或降低严重低血糖的发生频率。皮肤反应和其他问题导致随着时间推移传感器使用减少。