Tarnow-Mordi William O
Department of Neonatal Medicine, University of Sydney, Westmead Hospital, and The Children's Hospital at Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005 May;6(3 Suppl):S135-7. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000161581.42668.5E.
The goal of therapeutic studies in neonatal sepsis is to increase disability-free survival. Mortality may not be an adequate measure of outcome if it is reduced at the cost of increased disability. No neonatal organ dysfunction score has yet been validated as a reliable surrogate for disability-free survival. To validate a score as a surrogate would require randomized trials showing 1) a causal connection between change in the score and change in disability-free survival and 2) that the score fully captured all the effects of treatment on disability-free survival. Neonatal illness severity scores provide a convenient, but imperfect, tool to adjust for risk of sepsis in observational studies. They can help to stratify infants by risk of sepsis at entry to trials, allowing analyses of outcome in predefined subgroups. However, they cannot circumvent the need for randomized trials of adequate size in neonatal sepsis, which address disability-free survival as the primary outcome.
新生儿败血症治疗研究的目标是提高无残疾生存率。如果以增加残疾为代价降低死亡率,那么死亡率可能不足以衡量治疗结果。目前尚无新生儿器官功能障碍评分被证实可作为无残疾生存的可靠替代指标。要验证一个评分可作为替代指标,需要进行随机试验,证明:1)评分变化与无残疾生存变化之间存在因果关系;2)该评分能完全反映治疗对无残疾生存的所有影响。新生儿疾病严重程度评分是一种方便但并不完美的工具,可用于在观察性研究中调整败血症风险。它们有助于在试验入组时按败血症风险对婴儿进行分层,以便对预先定义的亚组进行结局分析。然而,它们无法规避在新生儿败血症中开展足够规模的随机试验的必要性,这类试验将无残疾生存作为主要结局指标。