Middlekauff H R, Wiener I, Saxon L A, Stevenson W G
Department of Medicine, UCLA School of Medicine 90024-1679.
Ann Intern Med. 1992 Jun 15;116(12 Pt 1):1017-20. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-116-12-1017.
Because atrial fibrillation is associated with substantial morbidity, restoration of sinus rhythm is desirable. Long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm often requires chronic antiarrhythmic therapy. Class I antiarrhythmic drugs such as quinidine or propafenone maintain sinus rhythm in approximately 50% of patients at 1 year and have risks for proarrhythmia and noncardiac toxicity. Studies of low-dose amiodarone for atrial fibrillation have reported sinus rhythm maintenance in 53% to 79% of patients during a mean follow-up of 27 months. Amiodarone has a lower incidence of proarrhythmia and heart failure exacerbation compared with class I drugs. Most noncardiac side effects are dose related, and low-dose amiodarone (less than 300 mg/d) is well tolerated. The time has come for a large-scale prospective evaluation of low-dose amiodarone treatment early in the course of atrial fibrillation.
由于心房颤动与严重的发病率相关,恢复窦性心律是可取的。窦性心律的长期维持通常需要长期抗心律失常治疗。I类抗心律失常药物如奎尼丁或普罗帕酮在1年时可使约50%的患者维持窦性心律,且有致心律失常和非心脏毒性的风险。低剂量胺碘酮治疗心房颤动的研究报告,在平均27个月的随访期间,53%至79%的患者维持窦性心律。与I类药物相比,胺碘酮致心律失常和心力衰竭加重的发生率较低。大多数非心脏副作用与剂量相关,低剂量胺碘酮(小于300mg/d)耐受性良好。是时候对心房颤动病程早期的低剂量胺碘酮治疗进行大规模前瞻性评估了。