Chun S H, Sager P T, Stevenson W G, Nademanee K, Middlekauff H R, Singh B N
Division of Cardiology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center of West Los Angeles, California 90073, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 1995 Jul 1;76(1):47-50. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80799-1.
The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of amiodarone to maintain sinus rhythm in patients with refractory atrial fibrillation or flutter. One hundred ten patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter, refractory to > or = 1 class I antiarrhythmic agents (mean +/- SD 2.5 +/- 1.5, median 2), were given low-dose amiodarone (mean maintenance dose 268 +/- 100 mg/day) to determine its efficacy to maintain normal sinus rhythm after chemical or electrical cardioversion. Fifty-three patients had chronic and 57 patients had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or flutter. Mean age of the study population was 60 +/- 13 years, and the mean follow-up was 36 +/- 38 months (range 31 days to 137 months). Actuarial rates for maintenance of sinus rhythm were 0.87, 0.70, and 0.55 at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Twenty-one patients (19%) with arrhythmia recurrence had an increase in amiodarone dose, and after a mean additional follow-up of 2.5 years, 86% remained in normal sinus rhythm. The only observed predictor of atrial fibrillation or flutter recurrence was paroxysmal arrhythmia (40% recurrence vs 9% in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation or flutter; p < 0.001). Actuarial rates for withdrawal because of adverse effects were 0.08, 0.22, and 0.30 at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The most frequent adverse effects necessitating withdrawal were skin discoloration (4.5%), pulmonary fibrosis (3.6%; none fatal), and thyroid toxicity (2.7%). No deaths occurred during the study period. In conclusion, amiodarone sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter, with a relatively low incidence of adverse effects necessitating withdrawal.
本研究的目的是检验胺碘酮在难治性心房颤动或心房扑动患者中维持窦性心律的疗效和安全性。110例对≥1种I类抗心律失常药物难治的心房颤动或心房扑动患者(平均±标准差2.5±1.5,中位数2),给予低剂量胺碘酮(平均维持剂量268±100mg/天),以确定其在化学或电复律后维持正常窦性心律的疗效。53例患者为慢性心房颤动或心房扑动,57例患者为阵发性心房颤动或心房扑动。研究人群的平均年龄为60±13岁,平均随访时间为36±38个月(范围31天至137个月)。窦性心律维持的精算率在1年、3年和5年时分别为0.87、0.70和0.55。21例(19%)心律失常复发患者增加了胺碘酮剂量,平均额外随访2.5年后,86%的患者仍维持正常窦性心律。观察到的心房颤动或心房扑动复发的唯一预测因素是阵发性心律失常(复发率40%,而慢性心房颤动或心房扑动患者为9%;p<0.001)。因不良反应而停药的精算率在1年、3年和5年时分别为0.08、0.22和0.30。导致停药的最常见不良反应是皮肤变色(4.5%)、肺纤维化(3.6%;无死亡病例)和甲状腺毒性(2.7%)。研究期间无死亡病例。总之,胺碘酮可使心房颤动或心房扑动患者维持窦性心律,因不良反应而停药的发生率相对较低。