Suppr超能文献

心脏再同步治疗(CRT)患者的基本起搏频率:越高越好?

The basic pacing rate in CRT patients: the higher the better?

作者信息

Voss Frederik, Becker Ruediger, Hauck Melanie, Katus Hugo A, Bauer Alexander

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Res Cardiol. 2009 Apr;98(4):219-23. doi: 10.1007/s00392-009-0745-2. Epub 2009 Feb 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To maximize the hemodynamic benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), echocardiographic AV interval optimization is routinely performed, complemented by VV interval optimization especially in non-responders. Programming of the basic pacing rate, however, is largely empirical in these patients. Therefore, the present study aimed to systematically evaluate the impact of basic pacing rate on hemodynamic parameters in CRT patients with sinus bradycardia.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We included 70 consecutive patients with moderate to severe heart failure, LV ejection fraction <or=35%, left bundle branch block or a QRS duration >120 ms combined with echocardiographic evidence of ventricular dyssynchrony. All patients were on optimal heart failure medication, with CRT-ICD devices implanted at least 6 months before inclusion into the study. All patients were in sinus rhythm with a spontaneous heart rate <40 bpm. In all patients, cardiac output (CO) and stroke volume (SV) were determined using electrical velocimetry (EV) (Aesculon, Osypka Medical, Berlin, Germany). EV provides a new algorithm to calculate CO based on variations in thoracic electrical bioimpedance, which has been recently validated. Hemodynamic measurements were performed at four different pacing rates ranging from 40 to 70 bpm. A stepwise increase in CO was encountered with increasing heart rates, reaching statistical significance when comparing 70 with 40 bpm. SV remained unchanged throughout all pacing rates.

CONCLUSIONS

In the range between 40 and 70 bpm, an increase in basic pacing rate enhances CO without reducing SV. According to this pilot study, a basic pacing rate between 60 and 70 bpm would appear reasonable.

摘要

背景

为了使心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的血流动力学益处最大化,常规进行超声心动图房室间期优化,并辅以室间间期优化,尤其是对于无反应者。然而,在这些患者中,基本起搏频率的设定很大程度上是经验性的。因此,本研究旨在系统评估基本起搏频率对窦性心动过缓的CRT患者血流动力学参数的影响。

方法与结果

我们纳入了70例连续的中重度心力衰竭患者,左心室射血分数≤35%,左束支传导阻滞或QRS波时限>120毫秒,并伴有心室不同步的超声心动图证据。所有患者均接受最佳心力衰竭药物治疗,在纳入研究前至少6个月植入CRT-ICD装置。所有患者均为窦性心律,自发心率<40次/分。在所有患者中,使用电测速法(EV)(德国柏林Osypka Medical公司的Aesculon)测定心输出量(CO)和每搏输出量(SV)。EV提供了一种基于胸壁电阻抗变化计算CO的新算法,该算法最近已得到验证。在40至70次/分的四种不同起搏频率下进行血流动力学测量。随着心率增加,CO呈逐步增加,将70次/分与40次/分比较时达到统计学显著性。在所有起搏频率下,SV保持不变。

结论

在40至70次/分的范围内,基本起搏频率的增加可提高CO而不降低SV。根据这项初步研究,60至70次/分的基本起搏频率似乎是合理的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验