• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[BAKO 1 - 4的因子结构。关于用于确定语音处理能力的“1 - 4年级基础能力”测试的验证]

[Factorial structure of the BAKO 1-4. On the validation of the "Base competence for school years 1-4" test for determining phonological processing].

作者信息

Ptok M, Buller N

机构信息

Klinik und Poliklinik für Phoniatrie und Pädaudiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover.

出版信息

HNO. 2006 Nov;54(11):888-92. doi: 10.1007/s00106-005-1245-y.

DOI:10.1007/s00106-005-1245-y
PMID:15864487
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Phonological awareness in native German speaking school children in grades 1 through 4 can be tested using the BAKO 1-4. We raised the question whether BAKO 1-4 subtests probe different aspects of phonological processing.

METHODS

Participants were 62 school children aged 7-12 years. Application of the BAKO 1-4 was performed during routine clinical testing.

RESULTS

Statistical analysis indicated two factors with sufficient loading as latent variables.

DISCUSSION

Our data indicate that two underlying variables constitute BAKO 1-4 test performance: the first involves "conscious phonological processing in a narrow sense", and the second involves decision making. Two subtests loading on factor 2 may be related to the decision making processes. This has to be kept in mind when applying the test to indecisive children.

摘要

背景

使用BAKO 1 - 4可以测试1至4年级以德语为母语的在校儿童的语音意识。我们提出了一个问题,即BAKO 1 - 4子测试是否探究了语音处理的不同方面。

方法

参与者为62名7至12岁的在校儿童。BAKO 1 - 4在常规临床测试期间进行应用。

结果

统计分析表明有两个因素作为潜在变量具有足够的载荷。

讨论

我们的数据表明,两个潜在变量构成了BAKO 1 - 4测试表现:第一个涉及“狭义的有意识语音处理”,第二个涉及决策。加载在因素2上的两个子测试可能与决策过程有关。在对优柔寡断的儿童应用该测试时必须牢记这一点。

相似文献

1
[Factorial structure of the BAKO 1-4. On the validation of the "Base competence for school years 1-4" test for determining phonological processing].[BAKO 1 - 4的因子结构。关于用于确定语音处理能力的“1 - 4年级基础能力”测试的验证]
HNO. 2006 Nov;54(11):888-92. doi: 10.1007/s00106-005-1245-y.
2
[Validity assessment of a low level phonological processing test material in preschool children].[一项针对学龄前儿童的低水平语音处理测试材料的效度评估]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2012 Jul;91(7):440-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1277202. Epub 2011 May 24.
3
Screening of phonological awareness in the early elementary grades: an IRT approach.小学低年级语音意识筛查:一种项目反应理论方法
Ann Dyslexia. 2007 Jun;57(1):33-50. doi: 10.1007/s11881-007-0001-2. Epub 2007 May 22.
4
[How do results in BAKO 1-4 and H-LAD-test correlate with auditory processing?].
Laryngorhinootologie. 2010 Jul;89(7):410-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1249679. Epub 2010 Apr 12.
5
[Can children with APD be discriminated from those with APD plus SLI by test diagnostic?].[能否通过测试诊断将患有听觉处理障碍(APD)的儿童与患有 APD 加特定语言障碍(SLI)的儿童区分开来?]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2014 Jan;93(1):30-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1347244. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
6
Gaps-in-noise (GIN©) test results in children with and without reading disabilities and phonological processing deficits.有无阅读障碍和语音处理缺陷儿童的噪声间隙(GIN©)测试结果。
Int J Audiol. 2013 Feb;52(2):113-23. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2012.733421. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
7
A critique of Mody, Studdert-Kennedy, and Brady's "Speech perception deficits in poor readers: auditory processing or phonological coding?".
J Learn Disabil. 1999 Sep-Oct;32(5):379-83. doi: 10.1177/002221949903200502.
8
[Auditory processing and phonological processing do not correlate in preschool children].[听觉处理与语音处理在学龄前儿童中不相关]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2007 Aug;86(8):574-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-966095. Epub 2007 Jan 26.
9
[Selected performances in speech perception in children with APD].[听觉处理障碍儿童的言语感知相关选定表现]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2009 Aug;88(8):534-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1202367. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
10
[(Central) Auditory Processing Disorders in Childhood--a Chimera or are Useful Clinical Diagnostic Tests Missing?].[儿童期(中枢性)听觉处理障碍——是一种幻想还是缺少有用的临床诊断测试?]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2008 Nov;87(11):791-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1077326. Epub 2008 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

1
[Is a differentiation between low-level and higher phonological processing in primary school children justified?].[小学儿童低水平与高水平语音处理之间的区分合理吗?]
HNO. 2011 Dec;59(12):1209-14. doi: 10.1007/s00106-011-2378-9.
2
[Minimal pair reproduction correlates with spelling ability].
HNO. 2008 Jan;56(1):73-80. doi: 10.1007/s00106-007-1583-z.

本文引用的文献

1
[Signal detection theoretical aspects of various threshold detection procedures].[各种阈值检测程序的信号检测理论方面]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2002 Jun;81(6):395-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-32207.
2
Outstanding questions about phonological processing in dyslexia.关于诵读困难症中语音处理的突出问题。
Dyslexia. 2001 Oct-Dec;7(4):197-216. doi: 10.1002/dys.205.
3
[Disorders of auditory processing and perception. Consensus statement].[听觉处理与感知障碍。共识声明]
HNO. 2000 May;48(5):357-60. doi: 10.1007/s001060050580.
4
When reading is "readn" or somthn. Distinctness of phonological representations of lexical items in normal and disabled readers.当阅读变成“readn”之类的发音时。正常读者和阅读障碍读者词汇项目语音表征的清晰度。
Scand J Psychol. 1998 Sep;39(3):149-53. doi: 10.1111/1467-9450.393070.
5
Changing relations between phonological processing abilities and word-level reading as children develop from beginning to skilled readers: a 5-year longitudinal study.儿童从初级阅读者成长为熟练阅读者过程中语音处理能力与单词层面阅读之间关系的变化:一项为期5年的纵向研究。
Dev Psychol. 1997 May;33(3):468-79. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.33.3.468.
6
The relationship between speech-language impairments and reading disabilities.语言障碍与阅读障碍之间的关系。
J Speech Hear Res. 1993 Oct;36(5):948-58. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3605.948.
7
Learning to read: the role of short-term memory and phonological skills.学习阅读:短期记忆和语音技能的作用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 1994 Aug;58(1):112-33. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1994.1028.
8
The development of phonological skills.语音技能的发展。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1994 Oct 29;346(1315):21-7. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1994.0124.
9
Toward an understanding of developmental language and reading disorders.迈向对发育性语言和阅读障碍的理解。
J Speech Hear Disord. 1986 Nov;51(4):337-47. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5104.337.