Pattemore P K, Johnston S L, Bardin P G
Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Clin Exp Allergy. 1992 Mar;22(3):325-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1992.tb03094.x.
The epidemiological studies cited have indicated that viruses are commonly associated with wheezing illnesses in populations, in individuals, and in time, but, unlike bacteria, are rarely found during asymptomatic periods. Viruses have been identified in up to 50% of wheezing illnesses and asthma exacerbations occurring in childhood, and in up to 20% of those in adults. In childhood the predominant organisms identified have been rhinoviruses. RSV and parainfluenza viruses, but coronaviruses have not been studied adequately. Wheezing appears to be more common during rhinovirus and RSV than other virus infections in children spontaneously presenting with respiratory infections to medical care, but all virus groups have been incriminated, and in general, wheezing occurs in upwards of 50% of viral infections in asthmatics followed prospectively. The few adult studies available show little difference between viruses in identification rates during wheezing, or propensity to result in wheezing. The predominant viruses change with age, and children with asthma seem to be more prone to symptomatic virus infections than other children, although the presence of atopy alone does not appear to be important. There are important gaps in our knowledge of the epidemiology of virus-associated wheezing attacks, and further prospective studies are required, using early investigation and sensitive methods for identifying rhinoviruses and coronaviruses, to study severe asthma in children and adults. It is hoped that the use of nucleic acid hybridization and newer antigen-detection techniques will improve the ability to identify difficult viruses such as coronaviruses and rhinoviruses in the future. The ability to identify subclinical infections and compare the ratio of subclinical to clinical infections in normal and asthmatic children would be useful but would require intense monitoring of both groups for an extended period (minimum 12 months to cover seasonal variation) with full virological studies every 2-4 weeks-a difficult and expensive task. Another important line of study would be to prospectively document indoor aeroallergen exposure and virus infections in the same individuals, and compare their importance as precipitants of acute severe asthma attacks. With a clearer understanding of the groups at risk for asthma attacks, and the factors which put them at risk and precipitate their attacks, effective preventive strategies will become more feasible.
所引用的流行病学研究表明,病毒在人群、个体以及不同时间段内通常都与喘息性疾病相关,但与细菌不同的是,在无症状期很少能检测到病毒。在儿童期发生的喘息性疾病和哮喘发作中,高达50%可检测出病毒,在成人中这一比例高达20%。在儿童期,已确定的主要病原体是鼻病毒、呼吸道合胞病毒和副流感病毒,但冠状病毒尚未得到充分研究。在因呼吸道感染而自发就医的儿童中,喘息在鼻病毒和呼吸道合胞病毒感染期间似乎比其他病毒感染更为常见,但所有病毒组都被认为与喘息有关,一般而言,在对哮喘患者进行前瞻性随访时,超过50%的病毒感染会引发喘息。现有的少数成人研究表明,在喘息期间病毒的检出率或引发喘息的倾向方面,不同病毒之间差异不大。主要病毒会随着年龄而变化,哮喘儿童似乎比其他儿童更容易出现有症状的病毒感染,不过单独的特应性似乎并不重要。我们对与病毒相关的喘息发作的流行病学认识存在重要空白,需要进一步开展前瞻性研究,采用早期检测和敏感方法来识别鼻病毒和冠状病毒,以研究儿童和成人的重度哮喘。希望未来使用核酸杂交和更新的抗原检测技术将提高识别诸如冠状病毒和鼻病毒等难检测病毒的能力。识别亚临床感染并比较正常儿童和哮喘儿童中亚临床感染与临床感染的比例会很有用,但这需要对两组进行长期(至少12个月以涵盖季节变化)的密集监测,每2 - 4周进行全面的病毒学研究——这是一项艰巨且昂贵的任务。另一项重要的研究方向是前瞻性记录同一人群室内空气过敏原暴露和病毒感染情况,并比较它们作为急性重度哮喘发作诱发因素的重要性。随着对哮喘发作高危人群以及使其处于风险并引发发作的因素有更清晰的了解,有效的预防策略将变得更加可行。