Brouard J, Freymuth F, Toutain F, Vabret A, Petitjean J, Gouarin S, Guillois B, Duhamel J F
Services de pédiatrie, hôpital universitaire, avenue Georges-Clemenceau, 14033 Caen, France.
laboratoire de virologie humaine et moléculaire, hôpital universitaire, avenue Georges-Clemenceau, 14033 Caen, France.
Rev Fr Allergol Immunol Clin. 2001 Jun;41(4):389-395. doi: 10.1016/S0335-7457(01)00042-9. Epub 2001 Dec 5.
Molecular processes can have a different impact on epidemiological data. The study covers 118 nasal aspirate samples taken on children hospitalized for acute asthma exacerbation for 2 years. Conventional techniques associated viral culture and immunofluorescence while molecular techniques used polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Virus presence was revealed with conventional techniques in 34% of the respiratory samples (40/118), while PCR study of viruses and genomes of and allowed positive identification in 68% of the samples (80/118). The combination of both techniques allowed identification of an infectious agent in 77% of cases (91/118). More than one pathogenic agent was isolated in 23% of positive samples. Epidemiological study shows prevalence of rhinovirus (45%), then respiratory syncytial virus (28%) and enterovirus (8.5%). In children under 2 years of age, rhinovirus and respiratory syncytial virus have a close prevalence (respectively 42 and 36%), which is not the same result as in older children (respectively 66 and 27%). Moreover, PCR techniques allowed the identification of just a few and (6/118). In this study, molecular techniques of identification demonstrate a clear advantage in sensitivity compared to performances of viral cultures or immunofluorescence. The importance of rhinovirus and respiratory syncytial virus is remarkable while an do not seem to be particularly involved.
分子过程可能对流行病学数据产生不同影响。该研究涵盖了2年期间因急性哮喘加重住院的儿童的118份鼻拭子样本。传统技术包括病毒培养和免疫荧光,而分子技术使用聚合酶链反应(PCR)。用传统技术在34%的呼吸道样本(40/118)中检测到病毒存在,而对病毒和相关基因组进行PCR研究则在68%的样本(80/118)中检测到阳性。两种技术结合可在77%的病例(91/118)中鉴定出感染因子。在23%的阳性样本中分离出不止一种病原体。流行病学研究显示鼻病毒患病率最高(45%),其次是呼吸道合胞病毒(28%)和肠道病毒(8.5%)。在2岁以下儿童中,鼻病毒和呼吸道合胞病毒的患病率相近(分别为42%和36%),这与大龄儿童的结果不同(分别为66%和27%)。此外,PCR技术仅鉴定出少数相关病毒(6/118)。在本研究中,与病毒培养或免疫荧光的性能相比,分子鉴定技术在灵敏度方面显示出明显优势。鼻病毒和呼吸道合胞病毒的重要性显著,而相关病毒似乎并未特别涉及其中。