Suppr超能文献

一项关于重大灾难后雇主赞助的危机干预措施有效性的前瞻性队列研究。

A prospective cohort study of the effectiveness of employer-sponsored crisis interventions after a major disaster.

作者信息

Boscarino Joseph A, Adams Richard E, Figley Charles R

机构信息

Division of Health & Science Policy, The New York Academy of Medicine, New York, NY 10029-5293, USA.

出版信息

Int J Emerg Ment Health. 2005 Winter;7(1):9-22.

Abstract

Postdisaster crisis interventions have been viewed by many as the appropriate and immediate approach to enhance psychological well-being among persons affected by large-scale traumatic events. Yet, studies and systematic reviews have challenged the effectiveness of these efforts. This article provides the first rigorous scientific evidence to suggest that postdisaster crisis interventions in the workplace significantly reduced mental health disorders and symptoms up to 2 years after the initial interventions. Until now, studies have neither focused on the effectiveness and safety of brief mental health services following disasters, or traumatic events generally, nor examined the long-term impact of these interventions across a spectrum of outcomes using a rigorous research design. The focus of this study was to examine the impact of brief mental health crisis interventions received at the worksite following the World Trade Center disaster (WTCD) among a random sample of New York adults. The data for the present study come from a prospective cohort study of 1,681 adults interviewed by telephone at 1 year and 2 years after this event. Results indicate that worksite crisis interventions offered by employers following the WTCD had a beneficial impact across a spectrum of outcomes, including reduced risks for binge drinking, alcohol dependence, PTSD symptoms, major depression, somatization, anxiety, and global impairment, compared with individuals who did not receive these interventions. In addition, it appeared that 2-3 brief sessions achieved the maximum benefit for most outcomes examined. Implications for postdisaster crisis interventions efforts are discussed.

摘要

许多人认为灾后危机干预是增强受大规模创伤事件影响人群心理健康的适当且即时的方法。然而,研究和系统评价对这些努力的有效性提出了质疑。本文提供了首个严谨的科学证据,表明工作场所的灾后危机干预在首次干预后长达两年的时间里显著减少了心理健康障碍和症状。到目前为止,研究既没有关注灾难或一般创伤事件后简短心理健康服务的有效性和安全性,也没有使用严谨的研究设计来检验这些干预在一系列结果方面的长期影响。本研究的重点是在纽约成年人的随机样本中,考察世贸中心灾难(WTCD)后在工作场所接受的简短心理健康危机干预的影响。本研究的数据来自一项前瞻性队列研究,该研究在事件发生后的1年和2年通过电话对1681名成年人进行了访谈。结果表明,与未接受这些干预的个体相比,雇主在世贸中心灾难后提供的工作场所危机干预在一系列结果方面产生了有益影响,包括降低暴饮、酒精依赖、创伤后应激障碍症状、重度抑郁、躯体化、焦虑和整体功能损害的风险。此外,对于所考察的大多数结果而言,2至3次简短疗程似乎能带来最大益处。文中还讨论了对灾后危机干预工作的启示。

相似文献

4
PTSD onset and course following the World Trade Center disaster: findings and implications for future research.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;44(10):887-98. doi: 10.1007/s00127-009-0011-y. Epub 2009 Mar 7.
5
Mental health service use 1-year after the World Trade Center disaster: implications for mental health care.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2004 Sep-Oct;26(5):346-58. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2004.05.001.
8
Social and psychological resources and health outcomes after the World Trade Center disaster.
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Jan;62(1):176-88. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.05.008. Epub 2005 Jul 5.
9
Psychological effects of attack on the World Trade Center: analysis before and after.
Psychol Rep. 2004 Apr;94(2):587-606. doi: 10.2466/pr0.94.2.587-606.

引用本文的文献

1
Report of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry Task Force on Lessons Learned From the COVID-19 Pandemic: Executive Summary.
J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry. 2021 Jul-Aug;62(4):377-386. doi: 10.1016/j.jaclp.2021.05.001. Epub 2021 May 14.
3
Workplace and safety perceptions among New York City employees after the 9/11 attacks.
Arch Environ Occup Health. 2021;76(7):363-371. doi: 10.1080/19338244.2020.1835797. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
4
Understanding burnout and moral distress to build resilience: a qualitative study of an interprofessional intensive care unit team.
Can J Anaesth. 2020 Nov;67(11):1541-1548. doi: 10.1007/s12630-020-01789-z. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
5
Terrorism and post-traumatic stress disorder: a historical review.
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Jan;6(1):61-71. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30335-3. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
6
Risk Factors for Depression Among Civilians After the 9/11 World Trade Center Terrorist Attacks: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
PLoS Curr. 2018 Mar 30;10:ecurrents.dis.6a00b40c8ace0a6a0017361d7577c50a. doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.6a00b40c8ace0a6a0017361d7577c50a.
8
Workplace response of companies exposed to the 9/11 World Trade Center attack: a focus-group study.
Disasters. 2013 Jan;37(1):101-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2012.01295.x. Epub 2012 Oct 16.

本文引用的文献

2
Partial PTSD versus full PTSD: an empirical examination of associated impairment.
Psychol Med. 2004 Oct;34(7):1205-14. doi: 10.1017/s0033291704002594.
3
Characteristics of successful early intervention programs.
Int J Emerg Ment Health. 2004 Fall;6(4):175-84.
4
Mental health service use 1-year after the World Trade Center disaster: implications for mental health care.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2004 Sep-Oct;26(5):346-58. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2004.05.001.
5
Adverse reactions associated with studying persons recently exposed to mass urban disaster.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2004 Aug;192(8):515-24. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000135476.20580.ae.
8

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验