• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

独特的加工过程是熟练记忆的基础。

Distinctive processing underlies skilled memory.

作者信息

Van Overschelde James P, Rawson Katherine A, Dunlosky John, Hunt R Reed

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Sci. 2005 May;16(5):358-61. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01540.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01540.x
PMID:15869693
Abstract

Research on skilled memory has focused on organizational processes to the exclusion of item-specific processes, although theories of skilled memory do acknowledge the importance of both kinds of processes. Using the isolation methodology, we presented lists of American football team names to participants who had either a high or a low level of knowledge about American football. An isolation effect (greater recall of the target in the isolate list than in a homogeneous control list) was observed only with high-knowledge participants. When standard lists were used, an isolation effect was observed with both groups. These findings empirically validate the importance of both organizational and item-specific processing as the basis of distinctive processing underlying skilled memory performance.

摘要

对熟练记忆的研究一直聚焦于组织过程,而忽略了特定项目的过程,尽管熟练记忆理论确实承认这两种过程的重要性。我们采用分离法,向对美式橄榄球了解程度高或低的参与者呈现美式橄榄球队名列表。仅在知识丰富的参与者中观察到了分离效应(与同质控制列表相比,分离列表中目标的回忆率更高)。当使用标准列表时,两组都观察到了分离效应。这些发现从实证角度验证了组织加工和特定项目加工作为熟练记忆表现基础的独特加工的重要性。

相似文献

1
Distinctive processing underlies skilled memory.独特的加工过程是熟练记忆的基础。
Psychol Sci. 2005 May;16(5):358-61. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01540.x.
2
Cognitive correlates of mnemonics usage and verbal recall memory in old age.老年人记忆术使用与言语回忆记忆的认知关联
Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol. 2001 Jan;14(1):15-22.
3
Telephone word-list recall tested in the rural aging and memory study: two parallel versions for the TICS-M.农村衰老与记忆研究中测试的电话单词表回忆:TICS-M的两个平行版本。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004 Sep;19(9):875-80. doi: 10.1002/gps.1170.
4
The effect of the length of to-be-remembered lists and intervening lists on free recall: a reexamination using overt rehearsal.待记忆列表长度及插入列表对自由回忆的影响:一项使用公开复述的重新审视
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Nov;30(6):1196-210. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.6.1196.
5
Can intentional forgetting reduce false memory? Effects of list-level and item-level forgetting.有意遗忘能减少错误记忆吗?列表层面和项目层面遗忘的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Jan;127(1):146-53. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.03.004. Epub 2007 May 1.
6
An item gains and losses analysis of false memories suggests critical items receive more item-specific processing than list items.虚假记忆的项目得失分析表明,关键项目比列表项目接受更多的特定于项目的加工。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Mar;32(2):277-89. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.2.277.
7
From brief gaps to very long pauses: temporal isolation does not benefit serial recall.从短暂间隙到很长停顿:时间间隔对系列回忆并无益处。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Dec;12(6):999-1004.
8
The interactive effects of prior knowledge and text structure on memory for cognitive psychology texts.先验知识与文本结构对认知心理学文本记忆的交互作用。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2004 Dec;74(Pt 4):497-514. doi: 10.1348/0007099042376418.
9
Knowledge accessibility, achievement goals, and memory strategy maintenance.知识可及性、成就目标与记忆策略维持
Br J Educ Psychol. 2005 Mar;75(Pt 1):87-104. doi: 10.1348/000709904X19227.
10
Impaired semantic knowledge underlies the reduced verbal short-term storage capacity in Alzheimer's disease.阿尔茨海默病患者言语短期记忆容量降低的原因是语义知识受损。
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Dec;47(14):3067-73. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.07.002. Epub 2009 Jul 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Learning strategy impacts medical diagnostic reasoning in early learners.学习策略对医学诊断推理在早期学习者中的影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 Mar 9;8(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00472-3.
2
Does the "surprisingly popular" method yield accurate crowdsourced predictions?这种“出人意料地受欢迎”的方法得出的是准确的众包预测吗?
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Nov 11;5(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00256-z.
3
Performance assessment to investigate the domain specificity of instructional skills among pre-service and in-service teachers of mathematics and economics.
表现评估,研究数学和经济学职前教师与在职教师教学技能的领域特殊性。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2019 Sep;89(3):538-550. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12277. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
4
The effects of prior knowledge on the encoding of episodic contextual details.先前知识对情景语境细节编码的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Apr;19(2):251-7. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0196-4.
5
What you know can hurt you: effects of age and prior knowledge on the accuracy of judgments of learning.所知可能会造成伤害:年龄和先前知识对学习判断准确性的影响。
Psychol Aging. 2011 Dec;26(4):919-31. doi: 10.1037/a0023379. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
6
Age differences in the effects of domain knowledge on reading efficiency.领域知识对阅读效率影响中的年龄差异。
Psychol Aging. 2009 Mar;24(1):63-74. doi: 10.1037/a0014586.