Mckinley Galen, Zuk Miriam, Höjer Morten, Avalos Montserrat, González Isabel, Iniestra Rodolfo, Laguna Israel, Martínez Miguel A, Osnaya Patricia, Reynales Luz M, Valdés Raydel, Martínez Julia
Instituto Nacional de Ecología, Col Insurgentes Cuicuilco, DF, México 04530 México.
Environ Sci Technol. 2005 Apr 1;39(7):1954-61. doi: 10.1021/es035183e.
Complex sociopolitical, economic, and geographical realities cause the 20 million residents of Mexico City to suffer from some of the worst air pollution conditions in the world. Greenhouse gas emissions from the city are also substantial, and opportunities for joint local-global air pollution control are being sought. Although a plethora of measures to improve local air quality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions have been proposed for Mexico City, resources are not available for implementation of all proposed controls and thus prioritization must occur. Yet policy makers often do not conduct comprehensive quantitative analyses to inform these decisions. We reanalyze a subset of currently proposed control measures, and derive cost and health benefit estimates that are directly comparable. This study illustrates that improved quantitative analysis can change implementation prioritization for air pollution and greenhouse gas control measures in Mexico City.
复杂的社会政治、经济和地理现实,使得墨西哥城的2000万居民遭受着世界上最严重的空气污染状况。该城市的温室气体排放量也相当可观,目前正在寻求地方与全球联合控制空气污染的机会。尽管针对墨西哥城已经提出了大量改善当地空气质量和减少温室气体排放的措施,但实施所有提议的控制措施所需资源并不具备,因此必须进行优先排序。然而,政策制定者往往没有进行全面的定量分析来为这些决策提供依据。我们重新分析了当前提议的一部分控制措施,并得出了可直接比较的成本和健康效益估算。这项研究表明,改进后的定量分析可以改变墨西哥城空气污染和温室气体控制措施的实施优先级。