• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

失忆症患者的分类能力真的完好无损吗?一项元分析。

Is categorization performance really intact in amnesia? A meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zaki Safa R

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Bronfman Science Center, Williams College, Williamstown, MA 01267, USA.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Dec;11(6):1048-54. doi: 10.3758/bf03196735.

DOI:10.3758/bf03196735
PMID:15875974
Abstract

Most published studies of category learning in amnesia have reported intact categorization performance. These results have been used to challenge single-system accounts of categorization and recognition, in which a single representational system mediates performance in these two tasks. Many of the published studies, however, have shown a numerical advantage for controls over amnesics and often have had low statistical power. A meta-analysis was conducted to assess whether this numerical advantage is significant when the data are pooled across studies. This analysis indicates that amnesic subjects do, in fact, show deficits in categorization tasks, which is consistent with single-system exemplar model predictions.

摘要

大多数已发表的关于失忆症患者类别学习的研究都报告称其分类表现完好。这些结果被用于挑战分类和识别的单系统理论,即在这两项任务中,单一表征系统介导了表现。然而,许多已发表的研究显示,对照组在数值上优于失忆症患者,且往往统计效力较低。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估当跨研究汇总数据时,这种数值优势是否显著。该分析表明,失忆症患者在分类任务中实际上确实表现出缺陷,这与单系统范例模型的预测一致。

相似文献

1
Is categorization performance really intact in amnesia? A meta-analysis.失忆症患者的分类能力真的完好无损吗?一项元分析。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Dec;11(6):1048-54. doi: 10.3758/bf03196735.
2
Journey to the center of the category: the dissociation in amnesia between categorization and recognition.范畴核心之旅:失忆症中分类与识别之间的分离。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Jul;27(4):984-1002. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.27.4.984.
3
Quantitative modeling of category learning in amnesic patients.失忆症患者类别学习的定量建模
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2001 Jan;7(1):1-19. doi: 10.1017/s1355617701711010.
4
Categorization and recognition performance of a memory-impaired group: evidence for single-system models.记忆受损组的分类与识别表现:单系统模型的证据
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2003 Mar;9(3):394-406. doi: 10.1017/S1355617703930050.
5
Recognition and recall in amnesics.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1986 Jul;12(3):445-51.
6
Autonomic and recognition indices of memory in amnesic and healthy control subjects.失忆症患者与健康对照受试者记忆的自主神经及认知指标
Cortex. 1996 Sep;32(3):439-59. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(96)80003-7.
7
The contribution of recollection and familiarity to yes-no and forced-choice recognition tests in healthy subjects and amnesics.回忆和熟悉感对健康受试者及失忆症患者的是/否及强制选择识别测试的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2000;38(10):1333-41. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(00)00055-5.
8
Rate of forgetting in amnesia: I. Recall and recognition of prose.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1999 Jul;25(4):942-62. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.25.4.942.
9
The performance of amnesic subjects on tests of delayed matching-to-sample and delayed matching-to-position.
Neuropsychologia. 1995 Dec;33(12):1583-96. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(95)00145-x.
10
Evidence for the independence of recognition and recency memory in amnesic subjects.
Cortex. 1995 Mar;31(1):57-71. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80105-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Thinking as Analogy-Making: Toward a Neural Process Account of General Intelligence.作为类比推理的思维:迈向关于一般智力的神经过程解释。
J Neurosci. 2025 Apr 30;45(18):e1555242025. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1555-24.2025.
2
A neural network model of hippocampal contributions to category learning.一种海马体对类别学习贡献的神经网络模型。
Elife. 2023 Dec 11;12:e77185. doi: 10.7554/eLife.77185.
3
Generalization and the hippocampus: More than one story?泛化与海马:不止一个故事?

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence for a procedural-learning-based system in perceptual category learning.基于程序学习的系统在知觉类别学习中的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Oct;11(5):945-52. doi: 10.3758/bf03196726.
2
False prototype enhancement effects in dot pattern categorization.点模式分类中的错误原型增强效应。
Mem Cognit. 2004 Apr;32(3):390-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03195833.
3
Procedural learning in perceptual categorization.知觉分类中的程序学习。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2020 Nov;175:107317. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2020.107317. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
4
The Hippocampus Maps Concept Space, Not Feature Space.海马体绘制概念空间,而非特征空间。
J Neurosci. 2020 Sep 16;40(38):7318-7325. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0494-20.2020. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
5
Abstract Memory Representations in the Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex and Hippocampus Support Concept Generalization.腹侧前额叶皮层和海马体中的抽象记忆表征支持概念泛化。
J Neurosci. 2018 Mar 7;38(10):2605-2614. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2811-17.2018. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
6
The effect of encoding conditions on learning in the prototype distortion task.编码条件对原型扭曲任务中学习的影响。
Learn Behav. 2017 Jun;45(2):164-183. doi: 10.3758/s13420-016-0252-z.
7
Conscious and unconscious memory systems.有意识和无意识记忆系统。
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015 Mar 2;7(3):a021667. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a021667.
8
Not so fast: hippocampal amnesia slows word learning despite successful fast mapping.没那么快:尽管快速映射成功,但海马体失忆症会减缓词汇学习。
Hippocampus. 2014 Aug;24(8):920-33. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22279. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
9
Procedural memory effects in categorization: evidence for multiple systems or task complexity?分类中的程序性记忆效应:多系统证据还是任务复杂性?
Mem Cognit. 2014 Apr;42(3):508-24. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0375-9.
10
Generalization through the recurrent interaction of episodic memories: a model of the hippocampal system.通过情景记忆的反复交互进行泛化:海马系统模型。
Psychol Rev. 2012 Jul;119(3):573-616. doi: 10.1037/a0028681.
Mem Cognit. 2003 Oct;31(7):1114-25. doi: 10.3758/bf03196132.
4
Delayed feedback effects on rule-based and information-integration category learning.延迟反馈对基于规则和信息整合类别学习的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Jul;29(4):650-62. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.4.650.
5
Dissociating explicit and implicit category knowledge with fMRI.通过功能磁共振成像分离显性和隐性类别知识
J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 May 15;15(4):574-83. doi: 10.1162/089892903321662958.
6
Categorization and recognition performance of a memory-impaired group: evidence for single-system models.记忆受损组的分类与识别表现:单系统模型的证据
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2003 Mar;9(3):394-406. doi: 10.1017/S1355617703930050.
7
A single-system interpretation of dissociations between recognition and categorization in a task involving object-like stimuli.在一项涉及类物体刺激的任务中,对识别与分类之间解离的单系统解释。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2001 Dec;1(4):344-59. doi: 10.3758/cabn.1.4.344.
8
Is implicit learning spared in amnesia? Rule abstraction and item familiarity in artificial grammar learning.失忆症患者的内隐学习是否保留?人工语法学习中的规则抽象与项目熟悉度。
Neuropsychologia. 2002;40(12):2185-97. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00037-4.
9
Journey to the center of the category: the dissociation in amnesia between categorization and recognition.范畴核心之旅:失忆症中分类与识别之间的分离。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Jul;27(4):984-1002. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.27.4.984.
10
Quantitative modeling of category learning in amnesic patients.失忆症患者类别学习的定量建模
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2001 Jan;7(1):1-19. doi: 10.1017/s1355617701711010.