Müller C M
Department of Physical Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.
Int Rev Neurobiol. 1992;34:215-81. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7742(08)60099-9.
Activity-dependent plasticity relies on changes in neuronal transmission that are controlled by coincidence or noncoincidence of presynaptic and postsynaptic activity. These changes may rely on modulation of neural transmission or on structural changes in neuronal circuitry. The present overview summarizes experimental data that support the involvement of glial cells in central nervous activity-dependent plasticity. A role for glial cells in plastic changes of synaptic transmission may be based on modulation of transmitter uptake or on regulation of the extracellular ion composition. Both mechanisms can be initiated via neuronal-glial information transfer by potassium ions, transmitters, or other diffusible factor originating from active neurons. In addition, the importance of changes in neuronal circuitry in many model systems of activity-dependent plasticity is summarized. Structural changes in neuronal connectivity can be influenced or mediated by glial cells via release of growth or growth permissive factors on neuronal activation, and by active displacement and subsequent elimination of axonal boutons. A unifying hypothesis that integrates these possibilities into a model of activity-dependent plasticity is proposed. In this model glial cells interact with neurons to establish plastic changes; while glial cells have a global effect on plasticity, neuronal mechanisms underlie the induction and local specificity of the plastic change. The proposed hypothesis not only explains conventional findings on activity-dependent plastic changes, but offers an intriguing possibility to explain several paradoxical findings from studies on CNS plasticity that are not yet fully understood. Although the accumulated data seem to support the proposed role for glial cells in plasticity, it has to be emphasized that several steps in the proposed cascades of events require further detailed investigation, and several "missing links" have to be addressed by experimental work. Because of the increasing evidence for glial heterogeneity (for review see Wilkin et al., 1990) it seems to be of great importance to relate findings on glial populations to the developmental stage and topographical origin of the studied cells. The present overview is intended to serve as a guideline for future studies and to expand the view of "neuro" physiologists interested in activity-dependent plasticity. Key questions that have to be addressed relate to the mechanisms of release of growth and growth-permissive factors from glial cells and neuronal-glial information transfer. It is said that every complex problem has a simple, logical, wrong solution. Future studies will reveal the contribution of the proposed simple and logical solution to the understanding of central nervous plasticity.
依赖活动的可塑性依赖于神经元传递的变化,这些变化由突触前和突触后活动的同时或不同时发生所控制。这些变化可能依赖于神经传递的调节或神经元回路的结构变化。本综述总结了支持神经胶质细胞参与中枢神经活动依赖性可塑性的实验数据。神经胶质细胞在突触传递可塑性变化中的作用可能基于递质摄取的调节或细胞外离子组成的调节。这两种机制都可以通过钾离子、递质或源自活跃神经元的其他可扩散因子的神经元-胶质细胞信息传递来启动。此外,还总结了在许多依赖活动的可塑性模型系统中神经元回路变化的重要性。神经元连接性的结构变化可以通过神经胶质细胞在神经元激活时释放生长或生长许可因子,以及通过轴突终扣的主动移位和随后的消除来影响或介导。提出了一个统一的假设,将这些可能性整合到一个依赖活动的可塑性模型中。在这个模型中,神经胶质细胞与神经元相互作用以建立可塑性变化;虽然神经胶质细胞对可塑性有全局影响,但神经元机制是可塑性变化的诱导和局部特异性的基础。所提出的假设不仅解释了关于依赖活动的可塑性变化的传统发现,而且为解释中枢神经系统可塑性研究中尚未完全理解的几个矛盾发现提供了一个有趣的可能性。尽管积累的数据似乎支持所提出的神经胶质细胞在可塑性中的作用,但必须强调的是,所提出的一系列事件中的几个步骤需要进一步详细研究,并且几个“缺失环节”必须通过实验工作来解决。由于越来越多的证据表明神经胶质细胞的异质性(综述见Wilkin等人,1990),将神经胶质细胞群体的发现与所研究细胞的发育阶段和地形起源联系起来似乎非常重要。本综述旨在作为未来研究的指南,并扩展对依赖活动的可塑性感兴趣的“神经”生理学家的视野。必须解决的关键问题涉及神经胶质细胞释放生长和生长许可因子的机制以及神经元-胶质细胞信息传递。据说每个复杂问题都有一个简单、合乎逻辑但错误的解决方案。未来的研究将揭示所提出的简单合乎逻辑的解决方案对理解中枢神经可塑性的贡献。