Suppr超能文献

荷兰非心脏跳动供体肾脏:移植的分配与结果

Non-heart-beating donor kidneys in the Netherlands: allocation and outcome of transplantation.

作者信息

Keizer Karin M, de Fijter Johan W, Haase-Kromwijk Bernadette J J M, Weimar Willem

机构信息

Dutch Transplantation Foundation, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Transplantation. 2005 May 15;79(9):1195-9. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000160765.66962.0b.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since February 1, 2001, kidneys from both heart-beating (HB) and non-heart-beating (NHB) donors in The Netherlands have been indiscriminately allocated through the standard renal-allocation system.

METHODS

Renal function and allograft-survival rate for kidneys from NHB and HB donors were compared at 3 and 12 months.

RESULTS

The outcomes of 276 renal transplants, 176 from HB donors and 100 from NHB III donors, allocated through the standard renal allocation system, Eurotransplant Kidney Allocation System, and performed between February 1, 2001 and March 1, 2002 were compared. Three months after transplantation, graft survival was 93.7% for HB kidneys and 85.0% for NHB kidneys (P<0.05). At 12 months, graft survival was 92.0% and 83.0%, respectively (P<0.03). Serum creatinine levels in the two groups were comparable at both 3 and 12 months. Multivariate analysis identified previous kidney transplantation (relative risk [RR] 3.33; P<0.005), donor creatinine (RR 1.01; P<0.005), and NHB (RR 2.38; P<0.05) as independent risk factors for transplant failure within 12 months. In multivariate analysis of NHB data, a warm ischemia time (WIT) of 30 minutes or longer (P<0.005; RR 6.16, 95% confidence interval 2.11-18.00) was associated with early graft failure. No difference in 12-month graft survival was seen between HB and NHB kidneys after excluding the kidneys that failed in the first 3 months.

CONCLUSION

Early graft failure was significantly more likely in recipients of kidneys from NHB donors. A prolonged WIT was strongly associated with this failure. Standard allocation procedures do not have a negative effect on outcome, and there is no reason to allocate NHB kidneys differently from HB kidneys.

摘要

背景

自2001年2月1日起,荷兰心跳骤停(HB)供体和非心跳骤停(NHB)供体的肾脏均通过标准肾脏分配系统进行无差别分配。

方法

比较NHB和HB供体肾脏在3个月和12个月时的肾功能及移植肾存活率。

结果

比较了2001年2月1日至2002年3月1日期间通过标准肾脏分配系统(欧洲移植肾脏分配系统)分配的276例肾移植的结果,其中176例来自HB供体,100例来自NHB III供体。移植后3个月,HB肾移植肾存活率为93.7%,NHB肾为85.0%(P<0.05)。12个月时,移植肾存活率分别为92.0%和83.0%(P<0.03)。两组血清肌酐水平在3个月和12个月时相当。多变量分析确定既往肾移植(相对危险度[RR] 3.33;P<0.005)、供体肌酐(RR 1.01;P<0.005)和NHB(RR 2.38;P<0.05)为12个月内移植失败的独立危险因素。在对NHB数据的多变量分析中,热缺血时间(WIT)30分钟或更长(P<0.005;RR 6.16,95%置信区间2.11 - 18.00)与早期移植失败相关。排除前3个月内失败的肾脏后,HB和NHB肾在12个月移植肾存活率上无差异。

结论

NHB供体肾脏受者早期移植失败的可能性显著更高。热缺血时间延长与这种失败密切相关。标准分配程序对结果无负面影响,且没有理由对NHB肾与HB肾进行不同的分配。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验