Scheetz Linda J
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA.
Res Nurs Health. 2005 Jun;28(3):198-209. doi: 10.1002/nur.20075.
The purpose of this secondary data analysis was to compare age, injury severity, injury types, selected comorbidities, level of care (at trauma center [TC] and non-trauma center [NTC] hospitals), and survival among older motor vehicle trauma patients (N = 1,478). Patients admitted to both levels of care had similar comorbid conditions. TC patients had a higher injury severity, whereas NTC patients had a greater proportion of soft tissue injuries. Results of logistic regression analyses subsequent to group comparisons revealed that higher injury severity was associated with TC admission. The likelihood of TC admission of severely injured patients decreased in the presence of spinal, internal, and head injuries. Internal injuries, liver, renal, and cardiovascular diseases were associated with non-survival while hypertension was associated with survival. Special attention is needed when triaging older trauma patients because their injuries may be covert, thus putting them at risk for admission to a level of care that may be inappropriate given the extent of their injuries.
本次二次数据分析的目的是比较老年机动车创伤患者(N = 1478)的年龄、损伤严重程度、损伤类型、选定的合并症、护理级别(创伤中心[TC]和非创伤中心[NTC]医院)及生存率。入住这两个护理级别的患者合并症情况相似。TC患者的损伤严重程度更高,而NTC患者软组织损伤的比例更大。组间比较后的逻辑回归分析结果显示,损伤严重程度越高与入住TC相关。存在脊柱、内脏和头部损伤时,重伤患者入住TC的可能性降低。内脏损伤、肝脏、肾脏和心血管疾病与死亡相关,而高血压与生存相关。对老年创伤患者进行分诊时需要特别关注,因为他们的损伤可能不明显,因此鉴于其损伤程度,他们有被收治到不适当护理级别的风险。