Suppr超能文献

医患非言语交流工具的进一步分析。

Further analysis of a doctor-patient nonverbal communication instrument.

作者信息

Gallagher Timothy J, Hartung Paul J, Gerzina Holly, Gregory Stanford W, Merolla Dave

机构信息

Department of Sociology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Jun;57(3):262-71. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.06.008.

Abstract

This study examines the reliability and validity of the relational communication scale for observational measurement (RCS-O) using a random sample of 80 videotaped interactions of medical students interviewing standardized patients (SPs). The RCS-O is a 34-item instrument designed to measure the nonverbal communication of physicians interacting with patients. The instrument was applied and examined in two different interview scenarios. In the first scenario (year 1), the medical student's interview objective is to demonstrate patient-centered interviewing skills as the SP presents with a psychosocial concern. In the second scenario (year 3), the student's interview objective is to demonstrate both doctor-centered and patient-centered skills as the SP presents with a case common in primary care. In the year 1 scenario, 19 of the 34 RCS-O items met acceptable levels of inter-rater agreement and reliability. In the year 3 scenario, 26 items met acceptable levels of inter-rater agreement and reliability. Factor analysis indicated that in both scenarios each of the four primary relational communication dimensions was salient: intimacy, composure, formality, and dominance. Measures of correlation and differences involving the RCS-O dimensions and structural features of the interviews (e.g., number of questions asked by the medical student) are examined.

摘要

本研究使用80段医学生面试标准化病人(SP)的录像互动随机样本,检验了用于观察测量的关系沟通量表(RCS - O)的信度和效度。RCS - O是一个包含34个条目的工具,旨在测量医生与患者互动中的非语言沟通。该工具在两种不同的面试场景中应用和检验。在第一种场景(第1年)中,医学生的面试目标是在SP提出心理社会问题时展示以患者为中心的面试技巧。在第二种场景(第3年)中,学生的面试目标是在SP提出初级保健中常见病例时展示以医生为中心和以患者为中心的技巧。在第1年的场景中,34个RCS - O条目中有19个达到了可接受的评分者间一致性和信度水平。在第3年的场景中,26个条目达到了可接受的评分者间一致性和信度水平。因子分析表明,在两种场景中,四个主要的关系沟通维度均很突出:亲密性、沉着性、正式性和主导性。研究了涉及RCS - O维度和面试结构特征(如医学生提问的数量)的相关性和差异测量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验