Ullinger Jaime M, Sheridan Susan Guise, Hawkey Diane E, Turner Christy G, Cooley Robert
Department of Anthropology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2005 Oct;128(2):466-76. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20074.
To many Near Eastern archaeologists, the Late Bronze Age-Early Iron Age transition in the southern Levant indicates the emergence of a new ethnicity. The question remains, however, whether changes in the material culture are the result of an invasion of foreigners, or instead arose from shifting cultural and technical practices by indigenous peoples. This study utilized dental morphological traits to assess phenetic relationships between the Late Bronze Age site of Dothan (1500-1100 BC) and the Iron Age II site of Lachish (Tell ed-Duweir, 701 BC). Information on 30 dental crown and root traits was collected for 4,412 teeth, representing 392 individuals from Lachish and a minimum of 121 individuals from Dothan, using the Arizona State University Dental Anthropology System. Seventeen traits from Dothan and Lachish were compared with dentitions from a Byzantine Jerusalem monastery, Iron Age Italy, a Natufian group (early agrarians from the Levant), and a Middle Kingdom Egyptian site using C.A.B. Smith's mean measure of divergence statistic. The findings suggest that there are more similarities between Dothan and Lachish than either of them and other sites. This analysis indicates that the material culture changes were not the result of a foreign invasion. Rather, the Iron Age people of the southern Levant were related to their Bronze Age predecessors.
对许多近东考古学家而言,黎凡特南部的青铜时代晚期至铁器时代早期的过渡标志着一个新种族的出现。然而,问题依然存在,物质文化的变化是外国人入侵的结果,还是相反,是当地居民文化和技术实践转变的产物。本研究利用牙齿形态特征来评估多坦(公元前1500 - 1100年)青铜时代晚期遗址与拉吉什(泰勒德杜韦尔,公元前701年)铁器时代II遗址之间的表型关系。使用亚利桑那州立大学牙齿人类学系统,收集了4412颗牙齿上30种牙冠和牙根特征的信息,这些牙齿代表了来自拉吉什的392个人和来自多坦的至少121个人。使用C.A.B. 史密斯的平均差异度量统计方法,将多坦和拉吉什的17种特征与来自拜占庭耶路撒冷修道院、铁器时代意大利、一个纳图夫群体(来自黎凡特的早期农耕者)以及一个中王国埃及遗址的牙列进行了比较。研究结果表明,多坦和拉吉什之间的相似之处比它们与其他任何遗址的相似之处都要多。这一分析表明,物质文化的变化并非外国入侵的结果。相反,黎凡特南部的铁器时代人群与其青铜时代的祖先有关。