Tombaugh Tom N
Psychology Department, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ont., Canada K1S 5B6.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2005 Jun;20(4):485-503. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2004.11.004.
The present study explored several different procedures for determining the amount of change that occurred on the Mini-Mental State Exam [MMSE; Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). "Mini-Mental State": A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189-198] and Modified Mini-Mental State Exam [3MS; Teng, E. L., & Chui, H. C. (1987). The Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) examination. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 48, 314-318] over short and extended test-retest intervals. The test-retest scores were drawn from a selected sample of elderly individuals who participated in the Canadian Study of Health and Aging [Canadian Study of Health and Aging. (1994). The Canadian study of health and aging: Study methods and prevalence of dementia. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 150, 899-913] and were tested on two occasions (CSHA-1 and CSHA-2) separated by 5 years. On each occasion the MMSE and 3MS were administered twice at approximately 3-month intervals. Thus, the mental status tests were administered four times: times 1 and 2 at CSHA-1 and times 3 and 4 at CSHA-2. Mean difference scores and percent of baseline scores showed relatively small group changes over both short and long test-retest intervals for the MMSE and the 3MS. A reliable change index based on a linear regression model controlled for practice effects, psychometric errors due to low reliability, regression to the mean, and accounted for the effects of various demographic variables. Consequently, this reliable change index provided a better estimate of the amount of change that occurred for individual participants than did the mean Retest-Test 1 difference, percent of baseline change, or a reliable change index based on a Retest-Test 1 difference score. Normative data for the change scores are provided.
本研究探索了几种不同的程序,以确定在短期和延长的重测间隔内,简易精神状态检查表[MMSE;福尔斯坦,M.F.,福尔斯坦,S.E.,&麦克休,P.R.(1975年)。“简易精神状态检查表”:一种为临床医生评估患者认知状态的实用方法。《精神科研究杂志》,12,189 - 198]和改良简易精神状态检查表[3MS;邓,E.L.,&崔,H.C.(1987年)。改良简易精神状态检查表(3MS)。《临床精神医学杂志》,48,314 - 318]上发生的变化量。重测分数取自参与加拿大健康与老龄化研究[加拿大健康与老龄化研究。(1994年)。加拿大健康与老龄化研究:研究方法与痴呆患病率。《加拿大医学协会杂志》,150,899 - 913]的老年个体的选定样本,并在相隔5年的两个时间点(CSHA - 1和CSHA - 2)进行测试。每次测试时,MMSE和3MS均以大约3个月的间隔进行两次施测。因此,精神状态测试共进行了四次:CSHA - 1的第1次和第2次,以及CSHA - 2的第3次和第4次。平均差异分数和基线分数百分比显示,在MMSE和3MS的短期和长期重测间隔内,组内变化相对较小。基于线性回归模型的可靠变化指数控制了练习效应、因可靠性低导致的心理测量误差、均值回归,并考虑了各种人口统计学变量的影响。因此,与重测 - 测试1平均差异、基线变化百分比或基于重测 - 测试1差异分数的可靠变化指数相比,该可靠变化指数能更好地估计个体参与者发生的变化量。文中提供了变化分数的常模数据。