Contreras Gabriel, Greene Tom, Agodoa Lawrence Y, Cheek DeAnna, Junco George, Dowie Donna, Lash James, Lipkowitz Michael, Miller Edgar R, Ojo Akinlou, Sika Mohammed, Wilkening Beth, Toto Robert D
University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Hypertension. 2005 Jul;46(1):44-50. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000166746.04472.60. Epub 2005 May 16.
The African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension examined the effect on renal function decline of 2 blood pressure (BP) goals (low mean arterial pressure [MAP] < or =92 versus usual MAP 102 to 107 mm Hg) and 3 antihypertensives (ramipril versus amlodipine versus metoprolol). We previously reported that in all drug groups combined the BP intervention had similar effects on the primary outcome of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) slope or the main secondary clinical composite outcome of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), death, or GFR decline by 50% or 25 mL/min per 1.73 m2. This report examines the effect of the BP intervention separately in the 3 drug groups. The BP effect was similar among the drug groups for either GFR slope or the main clinical composite. However, the BP effect differed significantly among the drug groups for the composite of ESRD or death (P=0.035) and ESRD alone (P=0.021). Higher event rates for amlodipine patients assigned to the usual BP goal (0.087 per patient-year for ESRD or death and 0.064 per patient-year for ESRD) were seen compared with the remaining groups of the factorial design (range, 0.041 to 0.050 for ESRD or death; and range, 0.027 to 0.036 for ESRD). The low BP goal was associated with reduced risk of ESRD or death (risk reduction 51%; 95% confidence interval, 13% to 73%) and ESRD (54%; 8% to 77%) for amlodipine patients, but not for patients assigned to the other drug groups. These secondary analyses suggest a benefit of the low BP goal among patients assigned to amlodipine, but they must be interpreted cautiously.
非裔美国人肾脏疾病与高血压研究考察了2种血压目标(低平均动脉压[MAP]≤92与通常的MAP 102至107 mmHg)和3种抗高血压药物(雷米普利与氨氯地平与美托洛尔)对肾功能下降的影响。我们之前报告过,在所有联合用药组中,血压干预对肾小球滤过率(GFR)斜率这一主要结局或终末期肾病(ESRD)、死亡或GFR每1.73 m²下降50%或25 mL/min的主要次要临床综合结局具有相似的影响。本报告分别考察了3个药物组中血压干预的效果。对于GFR斜率或主要临床综合指标而言,各药物组之间的血压效果相似。然而,对于ESRD或死亡的综合指标(P = 0.035)以及单独的ESRD指标(P = 0.021),各药物组之间的血压效果存在显著差异。与析因设计的其他组相比(ESRD或死亡的发生率范围为0.041至0.050;ESRD的发生率范围为0.027至0.036),接受通常血压目标的氨氯地平患者的事件发生率更高(ESRD或死亡为每年每位患者0.087,ESRD为每年每位患者0.064)。低血压目标与氨氯地平患者发生ESRD或死亡的风险降低相关(风险降低51%;95%置信区间,13%至73%)以及ESRD风险降低相关(54%;8%至77%),但对于分配到其他药物组的患者则不然。这些次要分析表明,低血压目标对接受氨氯地平治疗的患者有益,但对其解释必须谨慎。