Suppr超能文献

一项关于用于确定闭合式腹腔镜检查中Veres针放置位置的四项测试的评估。

An evaluation of four tests used to ascertain Veres needle placement at closed laparoscopy.

作者信息

Teoh Bobby, Sen Rahul, Abbott Jason

机构信息

Department of Endo-Gynaecology, Royal Hospital for Women, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005 Mar-Apr;12(2):153-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2005.01.011.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the reliability of four commonly used tests to confirm the placement of the Veres needle during closed laparoscopy and their ability to determine other complications of entry.

DESIGN

A prospective observational study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).

SETTING

A university-affiliated teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia.

PATIENTS

Three hundred forty-five women undergoing closed laparoscopy using Veres needle peritoneal insufflation.

INTERVENTIONS

The double click test, the hanging drop test, the aspiration test, and the initial five pressures at the time of insufflation following Veres needle placement were assessed for their sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for correct intraperitoneal placement of the needle and the presence or absence of any complication such as preperitoneal insufflation, omental emphysema, or visceral injury.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Complications occurred in 65 (18.8%) of 345 women, with preperitoneal insufflation in 19 (5.5%) of the 345, a superficial gastric injury in 1 (0.3%), and omental emphysema in 45 (13%). There was poor sensitivity and positive predictive values for preinsufflation tests. The first five pressures after commencement of insufflation were a sensitive predictor (79%) of complications, particularly preperitoneal insufflation (100% sensitivity for this complication). When two or more passes of the Veres were required, there was a significantly greater chance of preperitoneal insufflation (chi2 = 20.5, p <.0001). Preperitoneal insufflation was not reported when the first five successive insufflation pressures were less than 10 mm Hg.

CONCLUSIONS

The double click, aspiration, and hanging drop tests provide very little useful information on the placement of the Veres needle at the time of closed laparoscopy. The initial gas pressures provide considerable information on the placement of the Veres needle, in particular the likelihood of preperitoneal insufflation. We conclude that the initial gas pressure is the only valuable measure to reflect correct intraperitoneal Veres needle placement.

摘要

研究目的

确定四种常用测试在闭合性腹腔镜检查期间确认Veress针放置位置的可靠性及其确定其他穿刺并发症的能力。

设计

前瞻性观察研究(加拿大工作组分类II-2)。

地点

澳大利亚悉尼一家大学附属教学医院。

患者

345名接受使用Veress针进行腹膜充气的闭合性腹腔镜检查的女性。

干预措施

评估双击测试、悬滴测试、抽吸测试以及Veress针放置后充气时的初始五个压力,以确定其对针正确放置于腹腔内以及是否存在任何并发症(如腹膜前充气、网膜气肿或内脏损伤)的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值。

测量与主要结果

345名女性中有65名(18.8%)发生并发症,其中345名中有19名(5.5%)发生腹膜前充气,1名(0.3%)发生浅表胃损伤,45名(13%)发生网膜气肿。充气前测试的敏感性和阳性预测值较低。充气开始后的前五个压力是并发症的敏感预测指标(79%),尤其是腹膜前充气(对该并发症的敏感性为100%)。当需要进行两次或更多次Veress针穿刺时,发生腹膜前充气的可能性显著更高(χ² = 20.5,p <.0001)。当连续的前五个充气压力小于10 mmHg时,未报告腹膜前充气情况。

结论

双击、抽吸和悬滴测试在闭合性腹腔镜检查时对于Veress针的放置提供的有用信息很少。初始气体压力提供了关于Veress针放置的大量信息,特别是腹膜前充气的可能性。我们得出结论,初始气体压力是反映Veress针正确放置于腹腔内的唯一有价值的指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验