Gromicho M, Ozouf-Costaz C, Collares-Pereira M J
Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Ciências, Centro de Biologia Ambiental, Lisboa, Portugal.
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;109(4):507-11. doi: 10.1159/000084211.
Despite the growing outcome of results that put doubt upon the reliability of silver (Ag) staining and chromomycin A3 (CMA3) fluorescent banding in the detection of major ribosomal gene sites (NORs), these methods have been widely used, especially in fishes. In order to clarify the previous patterns obtained with those techniques, we performed fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) with 28S rDNA probe followed by sequential CMA3 and Ag staining in diploid non-hybrid males of the Squalius alburnoides complex and in Squalius pyrenaicus. The results from all the studied specimens revealed a lack of correlation between classical and molecular techniques. Not just some other regions besides NORs were stained with CMA3 and Ag, but also the majority of the 28S rDNA sites were not detected. Care should then be taken in considering CMA3- and Ag-stained sites as NORs since their accuracy for that purpose may not always correspond to the expectations.
尽管越来越多的结果对银(Ag)染色和放线菌素A3(CMA3)荧光带型在检测主要核糖体基因位点(NORs)方面的可靠性提出了质疑,但这些方法仍被广泛使用,尤其是在鱼类研究中。为了阐明用这些技术获得的先前模式,我们对阿尔巴尼亚鲤复合种的二倍体非杂交雄性个体以及比利牛斯鲤进行了28S rDNA探针荧光原位杂交(FISH),随后依次进行CMA3和Ag染色。所有研究标本的结果显示,传统技术与分子技术之间缺乏相关性。不仅NORs以外的一些其他区域被CMA3和Ag染色,而且大多数28S rDNA位点未被检测到。因此,在将CMA3和Ag染色的位点视为NORs时应谨慎,因为它们在此目的上的准确性可能并不总是符合预期。