Hui Benjamin K, Noga Michelle L, Gan Kenman D, Wilman Alan H
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005 Jun;21(6):831-5. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20334.
To assess the quality of a navigator-gated, free breathing, steady-state free precession (SSFP) technique in comparison to a single breathhold for pulmonary artery imaging in normal volunteers.
Sagittal sections of the left pulmonary arteries of 10 volunteers were obtained with a three-dimensional SSFP sequence using both a single breathhold of 30 seconds and a navigator-gated version of the same sequence. The images were compared and rated by a blinded cardiovascular radiologist for image quality, sharpness, and artifact.
On a scale ranging from -2 to 2, in which positive numbers denote that the navigator method was favorable compared to the single breathhold method, image quality was rated 0.7+/-1.4, sharpness 0.6+/-1.5, and artifact 0.1+/-1.4. Thus, there was no statistical difference between the two methods.
The navigator-gated SSFP sequence is able to acquire images equal in quality to the breathhold sequence. This may be of clinical importance for pulmonary imaging in patients who are unable to sustain a long breathhold.
与单次屏气相比,评估导航门控自由呼吸稳态自由进动(SSFP)技术在正常志愿者肺动脉成像中的质量。
对10名志愿者的左肺动脉矢状面进行成像,使用三维SSFP序列,分别采用30秒的单次屏气和同一序列的导航门控版本。由一位不知情的心血管放射科医生对图像进行比较和评级,评估图像质量、清晰度和伪影。
在从-2到2的评分范围内(正数表示导航方法比单次屏气方法更优),图像质量评分为0.7±1.4,清晰度评分为0.6±1.5,伪影评分为0.1±1.4。因此,两种方法之间无统计学差异。
导航门控SSFP序列能够获取与屏气序列质量相当的图像。这对于无法长时间屏气的患者进行肺部成像可能具有临床重要性。