Suppr超能文献

制度化医疗保健的伦理道德难道还能不是康德式的吗?为统一的元伦理学收集基石。

Could the ethics of institutionalized health care be anything but Kantian? Collecting building blocks for a unifying metaethics.

作者信息

Kaldis Byron

机构信息

School of Humanities, The Hellenic Open University, Speusippou 27, Athens 106 76, Greece.

出版信息

Med Health Care Philos. 2005;8(1):39-52. doi: 10.1007/s11019-005-0102-9.

Abstract

Is a Health Care Ethics possible? Against sceptical and relativist doubts Kantian deontology may advance a challenging alternative affirming the possibility of such an ethics on the condition that deontology be adopted as a total programme or complete vision. Kantian deontology is enlisted to move us from an ethics of two-person informal care to one of institutions. It justifies this affirmative answer by occupying a commanding meta-ethical stand. Such a total programme comprises, on the one hand, a dual-aspect strategy incorporating the macro- (institutional) and micro- (person-to-person) levels while, on the other, it integrates consistently within moral epistemology a meta-ethics with lower-ground moral theories. The article describes the issues to be dealt with and the problems which have to be solved on the way to a unifying theory of that kind (Sections I-III) and indicates elements of Kantian moral philosophy which may serve as building blocks (Section IV). Among these are not only Kant's ideas concerning the moral acting of persons and his ideas concerning civil society and state but also his ideas concerning morality, schematism and religion.

摘要

是否存在一种医疗保健伦理?针对怀疑论和相对主义的质疑,康德道义论可能会提出一种具有挑战性的替代观点,即在将道义论作为一个总体纲领或完整愿景的条件下,肯定这种伦理的可能性。康德道义论旨在推动我们从两人之间的非正式护理伦理转向机构护理伦理。它通过占据一个具有主导性的元伦理立场来证明这个肯定性答案的合理性。这样一个总体纲领一方面包括一种双方面战略,将宏观(机构层面)和微观(人际层面)结合起来,另一方面,它在道德认识论中始终如一地将一种元伦理与基础较低的道德理论整合在一起。本文描述了在构建这样一种统一理论的过程中需要处理的问题和必须解决的难题(第一至三节),并指出了康德道德哲学中可作为构建要素的内容(第四节)。其中不仅包括康德关于个人道德行为的观点、他关于公民社会和国家的观点,还包括他关于道德、图式论和宗教的观点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验