Gunderson Martin
Department of Philosophy, Macalester College, St. Paul, MN 55105, USA.
Theor Med Bioeth. 2007;28(2):87-102. doi: 10.1007/s11017-007-9030-4. Epub 2007 May 22.
It is tempting to argue that Kantian moral philosophy justifies prohibiting both human germ-line genetic engineering and non-therapeutic genetic engineering because they fail to respect human dignity. There are, however, good reasons for resisting this temptation. In fact, Kant's moral philosophy provides reasons that support genetic engineering-even germ-line and non-therapeutic. This is true of Kant's imperfect duties to seek one's own perfection and the happiness of others. It is also true of the categorical imperative. Kant's moral philosophy does, however, provide limits to justifiable genetic engineering.
有人可能会认为,康德的道德哲学为禁止人类生殖系基因工程和非治疗性基因工程提供了正当理由,因为它们未能尊重人类尊严。然而,有充分的理由抵制这种诱惑。事实上,康德的道德哲学提供了支持基因工程的理由——甚至包括生殖系和非治疗性基因工程。康德关于追求自身完善和他人幸福的不完全义务就是如此。绝对命令也是如此。然而,康德的道德哲学确实为合理的基因工程设定了限制。