Häyry M
Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, Institute of Medicine, Law and Bioethics, School of Law, The University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
J Med Ethics. 2005 Nov;31(11):645-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.010058.
The concepts of autonomy as the self governance of individuals and dignity as the inner worth of human beings play an important role in contemporary bioethics. Since both notions are crucial to Immanuel Kant's moral theory, it would be tempting to think that Kantian ethics could ease the friction between the two concepts. It is argued in this paper, however, that this line of thought cannot be supported by Kant's original ideas. While he did make a conscious effort to bring autonomy and dignity together, his emphasis on the absolute inner worth of our collective humanity made it impossible for him to embrace fully the personal self determination of individuals, as it is usually understood in today's liberal thinking.
自主性作为个人的自我治理以及尊严作为人类的内在价值这两个概念在当代生物伦理学中发挥着重要作用。由于这两个概念对伊曼努尔·康德的道德理论都至关重要,因此很容易认为康德伦理学可以缓解这两个概念之间的冲突。然而,本文认为,这种思路无法得到康德原始思想的支持。虽然他确实有意识地努力将自主性和尊严结合起来,但他对我们集体人性的绝对内在价值的强调使他无法完全接受个人的个人自我决定,而这在当今的自由主义思想中通常是被理解的。