Jacobs Esther M G, Hendriks Jan C M, van Tits Berry L J H, Evans Patricia J, Breuer William, Liu Ding Yong, Jansen Eugene H J M, Jauhiainen Katri, Sturm Brigitte, Porter John B, Scheiber-Mojdehkar Barbara, von Bonsdorff Leni, Cabantchik Z Ioav, Hider Robert C, Swinkels Dorine W
Department of Clinical Chemistry, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Anal Biochem. 2005 Jun 15;341(2):241-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2005.03.008.
Non-transferrin-bound iron (NTBI) appears in the circulation of patients with iron overload. Various methods to measure NTBI were comparatively assessed as part of an international interlaboratory study. Six laboratories participated in the study, using methods based on iron mobilization and detection with iron chelators or on reactivity with bleomycin. Serum samples of 12 patients with hereditary (n=11) and secondary (n=1) hemochromatosis were measured during a 3-day analysis using 4 determinations per sample per day, making a total of 144 measurements per laboratory. Bland-Altman plots for repeated measurements are presented. The methods differed widely in mean serum NTBI level (range 0.12-4.32mumol/L), between-sample variation (SD range 0.20-2.13mumol/L and CV range 49.3-391.3%), and within-sample variation (SD range 0.02-0.45mumol/L and CV range 4.4-193.2%). The results obtained with methods based on chelators correlated significantly (R(2) range 0.86-0.99). On the other hand, NTBI values obtained by the various methods related differently from those of serum transferrin saturation (TS) when expressed in terms of both regression coefficients and NTBI levels at TS of 50%. Recent studies underscore the clinical relevance of NTBI in the management of iron-overloaded patients. However, before measurement of NTBI can be introduced into clinical practice, there is a need for more reproducible protocols as well as information on which method best represents the pathophysiological phenomenon and is most pertinent for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes.
非转铁蛋白结合铁(NTBI)出现在铁过载患者的血液循环中。作为一项国际实验室间研究的一部分,对测量NTBI的各种方法进行了比较评估。六个实验室参与了该研究,使用基于铁动员和用铁螯合剂检测或与博来霉素反应性的方法。在为期3天的分析中,对12例遗传性(n = 11)和继发性(n = 1)血色素沉着症患者的血清样本进行测量,每天每个样本进行4次测定,每个实验室总共进行144次测量。给出了重复测量的Bland-Altman图。这些方法在平均血清NTBI水平(范围0.12 - 4.32μmol/L)、样本间变异(标准差范围0.20 - 2.13μmol/L,变异系数范围49.3 - 391.3%)和样本内变异(标准差范围0.02 - 0.45μmol/L,变异系数范围4.4 - 193.2%)方面差异很大。基于螯合剂的方法获得的结果具有显著相关性(R²范围0.86 - 0.99)。另一方面,当以回归系数和50%转铁蛋白饱和度(TS)时的NTBI水平表示时,通过各种方法获得的NTBI值与血清转铁蛋白饱和度(TS)的值的相关性不同。最近的研究强调了NTBI在铁过载患者管理中的临床相关性。然而,在将NTBI测量引入临床实践之前,需要更具可重复性的方案以及关于哪种方法最能代表病理生理现象且对诊断和治疗目的最相关的信息。