Schubert Barbara, Grosse Perdekamp Maria T, Pfeuffer Petra, Raith Petra, Bröcker Eva-B, Trautmann Axel
Department of Dermatology, University of Würzburg, Josef Schneider Strasse 2, D-97080 Würzburg, Germany.
Eur J Dermatol. 2005 May-Jun;15(3):164-7.
In the medical community lectures and publications about nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) hypersensitivity have led to an increasing awareness and diagnosis of this condition. Frequently, the diagnosis NSAID hypersensitivity is based only on history, which is a vague and unreliable indicator. A two-stage diagnostic procedure with skin tests (to exclude IgE-mediated allergy) followed by single-blinded, placebo-controlled oral challenges was carried out on patients attending our clinic from 1997 to 2003 with the diagnosis of a NSAID hypersensitivity. Out of 260 patients tested, 61.5% described their NSAID hypersensitivity as cutaneous (urticaria, angioedema), 24.2% had respiratory symptoms (asthma, rhinitis), 3.5% had anaphylactoid reactions, and 10.8% described uncertain signs. In fact 55.0% of all patients previously labelled as NSAID sensitive tolerated NSAID when assessed by oral challenge, whereas 13.8% were truly NSAID sensitive. In 31.2% of patients the challenge test with the suspicious drug was either not done or rejected by the patient; but all showed a proven tolerance of alternative NSAID. Our study demonstrates that oral challenge tests are safe, practical and useful in ruling out NSAID hypersensitivity in approximately 50% of the patients who have previously been labelled as such.
在医学界,关于非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)超敏反应的讲座和出版物已使人们对这种病症的认识和诊断不断增加。通常,NSAID超敏反应的诊断仅基于病史,而病史是一个模糊且不可靠的指标。1997年至2003年期间,对我院诊断为NSAID超敏反应的患者进行了两阶段诊断程序,即先进行皮肤试验(以排除IgE介导的过敏反应),然后进行单盲、安慰剂对照的口服激发试验。在接受检测的260名患者中,61.5%称其NSAID超敏反应为皮肤性的(荨麻疹、血管性水肿),24.2%有呼吸道症状(哮喘、鼻炎),3.5%有类过敏反应,10.8%描述的症状不明确。实际上,在所有先前被标记为对NSAID敏感的患者中,经口服激发试验评估,55.0%的患者对NSAID耐受,而13.8%的患者确实对NSAID敏感。在31.2%的患者中,未对可疑药物进行激发试验或患者拒绝进行该试验;但所有患者均显示对其他NSAID有耐受。我们的研究表明,口服激发试验在排除约50%先前被标记为此类的患者的NSAID超敏反应方面是安全、实用且有用的。