Suppr超能文献

方法多元主义下的质量标准:对研究开展与评估的影响

Quality criteria under methodological pluralism: implications for conducting and evaluating research.

作者信息

Barker Chris, Pistrang Nancy

机构信息

Department of Clinical Health Psychology, University College London, London, England.

出版信息

Am J Community Psychol. 2005 Jun;35(3-4):201-12. doi: 10.1007/s10464-005-3398-y.

Abstract

Many community psychologists adhere to a methodological pluralist orientation to research; however, it is often unclear what such a position means in practice. This paper draws out the practical implications of methodological pluralism for community research. It proposes four sets of criteria for how research might be appraised under a pluralistic ethos: criteria applicable to all research, research-relevant community psychology values and principles, criteria specifically applicable to quantitative research, and criteria specifically applicable to qualitative research. The paper also addresses how pluralistic community research may be conducted, at each of three levels: integrating methods within a single study, using different approaches within a research program, and pluralism in the field as a whole.

摘要

许多社区心理学家坚持研究的方法论多元主义取向;然而,在实践中这种立场意味着什么往往并不明确。本文阐述了方法论多元主义对社区研究的实际影响。它提出了四套标准,用于在多元主义思潮下评估研究:适用于所有研究的标准、与研究相关的社区心理学价值观和原则、专门适用于定量研究的标准,以及专门适用于定性研究的标准。本文还讨论了如何在三个层面上进行多元主义的社区研究:在单个研究中整合方法、在研究项目中使用不同方法,以及在整个领域实现多元主义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验