Linney Jean Ann
University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 45556, USA.
Am J Community Psychol. 2005 Jun;35(3-4):253-8. doi: 10.1007/s10464-005-3404-4.
Commentary on the papers of the special issue identifies and discusses four themes: 1) strategies to bridge the gap between science and practice, 2) sources of community science questions of interest, 3) choice and quality of methods, and 4) epistemology and useful language for community science. The commentary identifies some limitations in the models proposed by the special issue authors, and proposes renewed attention to ecology, context and process in community change initiatives, calling for a common set of community level measures as one strategy to advance a community centered science agenda.
1）弥合科学与实践之间差距的策略；2）社区科学感兴趣问题的来源；3）方法的选择和质量；4）社区科学的认识论和有用语言。该评论指出了特刊作者提出的模型中的一些局限性，并提议在社区变革倡议中重新关注生态、背景和过程，呼吁采用一套共同的社区层面衡量标准作为推进以社区为中心的科学议程的一项策略。
