Miller Craig R, Joyce Paul, Waits Lisette P
Department of Fish & Wildlife, College of Natural Resources, PO Box 44-1136, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-1136, USA.
Mol Ecol. 2005 Jun;14(7):1991-2005. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02577.x.
The use of non-invasive genetic sampling to estimate population size in elusive or rare species is increasing. The data generated from this sampling differ from traditional mark-recapture data in that individuals may be captured multiple times within a session or there may only be a single sampling event. To accommodate this type of data, we develop a method, named capwire, based on a simple urn model containing individuals of two capture probabilities. The method is evaluated using simulations of an urn and of a more biologically realistic system where individuals occupy space, and display heterogeneous movement and DNA deposition patterns. We also analyse a small number of real data sets. The results indicate that when the data contain capture heterogeneity the method provides estimates with small bias and good coverage, along with high accuracy and precision. Performance is not as consistent when capture rates are homogeneous and when dealing with populations substantially larger than 100. For the few real data sets where N is approximately known, capwire's estimates are very good. We compare capwire's performance to commonly used rarefaction methods and to two heterogeneity estimators in program capture: Mh-Chao and Mh-jackknife. No method works best in all situations. While less precise, the Chao estimator is very robust. We also examine how large samples should be to achieve a given level of accuracy using capwire. We conclude that capwire provides an improved way to estimate N for some DNA-based data sets.
利用非侵入性基因采样来估计难以捉摸或珍稀物种的种群规模的做法正在增加。这种采样产生的数据与传统的标记重捕数据不同,因为在一次采样过程中个体可能被多次捕获,或者可能只有一次采样事件。为了处理这类数据,我们基于一个包含两种捕获概率个体的简单瓮模型开发了一种名为capwire的方法。该方法通过对一个瓮以及一个更具生物学现实性的系统(个体占据空间并呈现异质运动和DNA沉积模式)进行模拟来评估。我们还分析了少量真实数据集。结果表明,当数据包含捕获异质性时,该方法能提供偏差小、覆盖率好且具有高精度和精密度的估计值。当捕获率均匀且处理远大于100的种群时,性能则不太一致。对于少数已知近似种群数量(N)的真实数据集,capwire的估计效果非常好。我们将capwire的性能与常用的稀疏化方法以及程序Capture中的两种异质性估计器:Mh-Chao和Mh-折刀法进行了比较。没有一种方法在所有情况下都是最佳的。虽然精度较低,但Chao估计器非常稳健。我们还研究了使用capwire达到给定精度水平所需的样本量应多大。我们得出结论,对于一些基于DNA的数据集,capwire提供了一种改进的估计种群数量(N)的方法。