Adegboyega Patrick A, Qiu Suimin
Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 77555-0588, USA.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005 Jun;129(6):772-5. doi: 10.5858/2005-129-772-HVVMPO.
Arteriovenous vascular malformations and hemangiomas are benign vascular lesions that are difficult to distinguish from one another clinically. Also, they may be confused with each other at histopathology. Therefore, histochemical stains for the presence of an artery are frequently used to distinguish between the two.
Because it is clinically relevant to differentiate between arteriovenous vascular malformations and hemangiomas, this study was carried out to explore additional diagnostic clues that may help in the diagnosis and differentiation of these lesions.
A total of 167 cases of benign extracranial vascular lesions were retrieved from the anatomic pathology file of our institution. These comprised 66 cases diagnosed as arteriovenous vascular malformations and 101 cases previously diagnosed as hemangiomas. The hematoxylin-eosin-stained glass slides were reviewed, Movat pentichrome histochemical stain was used to identify elastic vessels (arteries/arterioles), and S100 immunostain was used to identify nerves within these vascular lesions. For immunohistochemistry, the avidin-biotin detection method was used.
With Movat stain, the presence of thick-walled elastic arteries was detected in 12 of the 101 cases previously diagnosed as hemangiomas, and these cases were therefore reclassified as vascular malformations. Using the same criterion, 2 of the 66 cases originally diagnosed as arteriovenous vascular malformations were reclassified as hemangiomas because they lacked arterial structures. Thus, with this strict criterion, we ended up with 91 cases of hemangiomas and 76 cases of arteriovenous vascular malformations. Intralesional nerves were identified in 91% (69/76) of cases of arteriovenous vascular malformations, including all the 12 arteriovenous vascular malformations previously diagnosed as hemangiomas. In contrast, no intralesional nerve was detected in any of the 91 hemangiomas.
These results show that nerve bundles are consistently present in vascular malformations and absent in hemangiomas and so can be used as a diagnostic clue to differentiate between these lesions. Also, in addition to describing a previously unreported component of vascular malformations, these data further confirm the hamartomatous nature of these lesions.
动静脉血管畸形和血管瘤是良性血管病变,临床上难以相互区分。此外,它们在组织病理学上也可能相互混淆。因此,常使用针对动脉存在情况的组织化学染色来区分这两者。
由于区分动静脉血管畸形和血管瘤具有临床相关性,本研究旨在探索有助于这些病变诊断和鉴别的其他诊断线索。
从本机构的解剖病理学档案中检索出167例颅外良性血管病变病例。其中包括66例诊断为动静脉血管畸形的病例和101例先前诊断为血管瘤的病例。对苏木精-伊红染色的玻片进行复查,使用莫瓦特五色组织化学染色来识别弹性血管(动脉/小动脉),并使用S100免疫染色来识别这些血管病变内的神经。免疫组织化学采用抗生物素蛋白-生物素检测法。
在莫瓦特染色中,先前诊断为血管瘤的101例病例中有12例检测到厚壁弹性动脉,因此这些病例被重新分类为血管畸形。使用相同标准,最初诊断为动静脉血管畸形的66例病例中有2例因缺乏动脉结构而被重新分类为血管瘤。因此,按照这个严格标准,最终有91例血管瘤和76例动静脉血管畸形。在76例动静脉血管畸形病例中有91%(69/76)发现病变内有神经,包括先前诊断为血管瘤的所有12例动静脉血管畸形。相比之下,91例血管瘤中均未检测到病变内神经。
这些结果表明,神经束在血管畸形中始终存在,而在血管瘤中不存在,因此可作为区分这些病变的诊断线索。此外,除了描述血管畸形中一个先前未报道的成分外,这些数据进一步证实了这些病变的错构瘤性质。